2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0928-8937(05)80043-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep structure of the Mid-Norwegian shelf and onshore-offshore correlations: Insight from potential field data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is currently little consensus concerning the possible duration and extent of Permo‐Triassic rifting in the Åsgard area in particular, or on the Halten Terrace in general. Firstly, several previous studies have argued that the distribution of these earlier extensional structures controls the geometry and location of Jurassic faults (Doré et al , 1997; Brekke, 2000; Osmundsen et al , 2002; Skilbrei & Olesen, 2005). Secondly, the Late Permian–Early Triassic rift topography is thought to have been one of the main controls on the thickness of Middle to Upper Triassic evaporites (Müller et al , 2005; Richardson et al , 2005).…”
Section: Results: Fault Growth and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is currently little consensus concerning the possible duration and extent of Permo‐Triassic rifting in the Åsgard area in particular, or on the Halten Terrace in general. Firstly, several previous studies have argued that the distribution of these earlier extensional structures controls the geometry and location of Jurassic faults (Doré et al , 1997; Brekke, 2000; Osmundsen et al , 2002; Skilbrei & Olesen, 2005). Secondly, the Late Permian–Early Triassic rift topography is thought to have been one of the main controls on the thickness of Middle to Upper Triassic evaporites (Müller et al , 2005; Richardson et al , 2005).…”
Section: Results: Fault Growth and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a strong magnetic contrast often exists between the sediments and the underlying crystalline basement the magnetic data can be used to estimate depth to the basement. This method has previously been used effectively on the mid‐Norwegian margin (Åm 1970; Skilbrei and Olesen 2005). Skilbrei and Olesen (2005) studied the accuracy and the geological meaning of the ‘magnetic basement’ on the mid‐Norwegian margin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has previously been used effectively on the mid‐Norwegian margin (Åm 1970; Skilbrei and Olesen 2005). Skilbrei and Olesen (2005) studied the accuracy and the geological meaning of the ‘magnetic basement’ on the mid‐Norwegian margin. They found generally good agreement between estimates made from magnetic anomalies and the depth to the Precambrian basement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The margin comprises three main segments, the Trøndelag Platform, the Vøring Basin and the Vøring Marginal High; which are separated by N‐S and NE‐SW‐trending fault systems (Blystad et al 1995). Seismic studies and potential field studies have shown that the basins underlying the margin have a thickness up to 15 km (e.g., Brekke 2000; Skilbrei and Olesen 2005; Mjelde et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential field studies constrained by seismic profiles can help to identify the 3D structure of the basement underlying sedimentary basins (e.g., Skilbrei and Olesen 2005; Ebbing et al 2006), which is important for models of basin evolution. Using common interpretation techniques, gravity and magnetic data can be used to constrain the top basement as well as the base of the crust (Moho) and to identify different intra‐basement domains, if they are expressed by changes in petrophysical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%