2016
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201600173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Structure of the Barents-Kara Region According to Geophysical Investigations Along 1-AR and 2-AR Geotravers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependence of karst formation both on dynamics of endogenous fracture tectonics and on exogenous factors [13,22,23] leads to continuous dynamics of karst development and to a nonzero hazard of the new vertical subsidence under the fast healing of karst formations. This implies the relevance of geodynamic evaluation of the area [20,24,25], especially under conditions of extensive mine workings, which are observed within the investigated object. Previously, the authors carried out the investigation of a seismogenic hazard in the vicinity of geodynamically active geoblocks because of activation of fault tectonics under conditions of hydraulic fracturing [10], with application of non-potential geofields.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…The dependence of karst formation both on dynamics of endogenous fracture tectonics and on exogenous factors [13,22,23] leads to continuous dynamics of karst development and to a nonzero hazard of the new vertical subsidence under the fast healing of karst formations. This implies the relevance of geodynamic evaluation of the area [20,24,25], especially under conditions of extensive mine workings, which are observed within the investigated object. Previously, the authors carried out the investigation of a seismogenic hazard in the vicinity of geodynamically active geoblocks because of activation of fault tectonics under conditions of hydraulic fracturing [10], with application of non-potential geofields.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…This intensity is higher in Tula Region compared to neighbouring territories owing to greater fragmentation and relatively high fracturing of carbonate strata. The dependence of karst formation both on dynamics of endogenous fracture tectonics and exogenous factors [12]- [14] bring about continuous dynamics of karst development and nonzero hazard of new vertical subsidence under the fast healing of karst formations implying the rele-vance of geodynamic evaluation of area [10], [15], [16]; it especially under conditions of extensive mine workings, which are observed within the investigated object. Previously, the authors have analyzed seismogenic hazard in the vicinity of geodynamically active geoblocks because of activation of fault tectonics under conditions of hydraulic fracturing [17] with application of non-potential geofields.…”
Section: Figure 1 Geostructural Position Of the Analyzed Area (According To Vn Brykhanov Va Boosh And Agchikishev): (A) Schematic Map Of mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With an average crack opening of about 5–7 mm, the crack length relative to the horizontal body of the well can be significant, reaching hundreds of metres [34,35]. Taking into account the length of the actual horizontal body of the well, ranging from the first hundred metres to 1–2 km, there is a probability of crossing the system of activated geological fracture and areas of regional geodynamics [36,37]. It has been observed that the operation of hydraulic fracturing may lead to significant seismic responses far beyond the immediate neighbourhood of the drilling location used for the gas and oil production or liquid waste management [3,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%