Abstract. Plate tectonic modellers often rely on the identification of “break-up”
markers to reconstruct the early stages of continental separation. Along the
Iberian-Newfoundland margin, so-called break-up markers include
interpretations of old magnetic anomalies from the M series, as well as the
“J anomaly”. These have been used as the basis for plate tectonic
reconstructions are based on the concept that these anomalies pinpoint the
location of first oceanic lithosphere. However, uncertainties in the
location and interpretation of break-up markers, as well as the difficulty
in dating them precisely, has led to plate models that differ in both the
timing and relative palaeo-positions of Iberia and Newfoundland during
separation. We use newly available seismic data from the Southern Newfoundland Basin
(SNB) to assess the suitability of commonly used break-up markers along the
Newfoundland margin for plate kinematic reconstructions. Our data show that
basement associated with the younger M-series magnetic anomalies is
comprised of exhumed mantle and magmatic additions and most likely
represents transitional domains and not true oceanic lithosphere. Because
rifting propagated northward, we argue that M-series anomaly identifications
further north, although in a region not imaged by our seismic, are also
unlikely to be diagnostic of true oceanic crust beneath the SNB. Similarly,
our data also allow us to show that the high amplitude of the J Anomaly is
associated with a zone of exhumed mantle punctuated by significant volcanic
additions and at times characterized by interbedded volcanics and
sediments. Magmatic activity in the SNB at a time coinciding with M4 (128 Ma) and the presence of SDR packages onlapping onto a basement fault
suggest that, at this time, plate divergence was still being accommodated by
tectonic faulting. We illustrate the differences in the relative positions of Iberia and
Newfoundland across published plate reconstructions and discuss how these
are a direct consequence of the uncertainties introduced into the modelling
procedure by the use of extended continental margin data (dubious magnetic
anomaly identifications, break-up unconformity interpretations). We conclude
that a different approach is needed for constraining plate kinematics of the
Iberian plate pre-M0 times.