Deep Structure in the Noun-Pair Learning of Children and Adults

Suzuki, Nancy S.; Rohwer, William D.

doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1969.tb04552.x

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…for his senior seminar project, and Experiment II is based on an MS thesis by the senior author (Allison, 1971 same and different underlying string conditions performed equivalently. Suzuki and Rohwer (1969) proposed two explanations for these findings. The first, emphasizing age-related differences in storage, is that adults, but not children, are capable of storing entire sentences as units so that the two nouns appear in the same unit in both kinds of sentences.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The present experiments evaluated these positions, Experiment I through manipulating test rate (as suggested by Suzuki and Rohwer), and Experiment II through manipulating complexity and length of the strings. In both experiments, the procedure was similar to that used by Suzuki and Rohwer (1969).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Suzuki and Rohwer (1969) hypothesized that the underlying strings of sentences correspond to memory units, making it easier to recall two nouns from the same underlying string than from two different underlying strings. They reported that data from ftfth graders supported this hypothesis but that data from college students did not.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To account for this "verb facilitation effect," Suzuki and Rohwer (1969) proposed the deep-structure hypothesis, which asserts that the underlying strings of sentences correspond to the functional units of memory storage. Thus, two nouns in the same memory unit (e.g., when connected by a verb) will be learned more easily than two nouns in different memory units (e.g., when connected by a conjunction) because of a simpler retrieval process.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In an experiment to evaluate this explanation, Suzuki and Rohwer (1969) used both simple and complex strings. On study trials, Ss saw each noun pair capitalized and underlined in a syntactical context; on test trials, the first noun of each pair was presented alone and S was instructed to provide the missing noun.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Memory for noun pairs in the same or different underlying strings

1973

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A number of studies have shown that children learn noun pairs faster when they have been presented in a noun-verb-noun context than when they are presented in a noun-conjunction-noun context. Suzuki and Rohwer (1969) hypothesized that the underlying strings of sentences correspond to memory units, making it easier to recall two nouns from the same underlying string than from two different underlying strings. They reported that data from ftfth graders supported this hypothesis but that data from college students did not. The experiments reported here were done to determine whether the hypothesis would be supported (a) if the test rate were faster than that used by Suzuki and Rohwer or (b) if sentences longer and more complex than those used by them were employed. The recall data accorded with some predictions derived from the hypothesis. However, data from Ss' posttraining reports on how they learned the pairs suggest that Ss, particularly adults, often made up their own strings rather than using those provided, and raise the question of the adequacy of Suzuki and Rohwer's procedure for testing this hypothesis, particularly in adults.A number of experiments Rohwer & Lynch, 1967) have shown that two nouns connected by a verb are learned faster as a pair than are two nouns connected by a conjunction. To account for this "verb facilitation effect," Suzuki and Rohwer (1969) proposed the deep-structure hypothesis, which asserts that the underlying strings of sentences correspond to the functional units of memory storage. Thus, two nouns in the same memory unit (e.g., when connected by a verb) will be learned more easily than two nouns in different memory units (e.g., when connected by a conjunction) because of a simpler retrieval process.In an experiment to evaluate this explanation, Suzuki and Rohwer (1969) used both simple and complex strings. On study trials, Ss saw each noun pair capitalized and underlined in a syntactical context; on test trials, the first noun of each pair was presented alone and S was instructed to provide the missing noun. Suzuki and Rohwer reported that with both simple and complex strings, fifth graders performed better when the two nouns were connected by a verb (same underlying string condition) than when connected by a conjunction (different underlying string condition), thus supporting the hypothesis. For college students, however, Ss in the *Experiment I was carried out by W.S.F. for his senior seminar project, and Experiment II is based on an MS thesis by the senior author (Allison,

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations