2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2014.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep sparse feature selection for computer aided endoscopy diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been some works in the last two years on endoscopy image analysis with deep learning [71][72][73]. Other approaches include using deep sparse feature selection (see, e.g., [74]). …”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some works in the last two years on endoscopy image analysis with deep learning [71][72][73]. Other approaches include using deep sparse feature selection (see, e.g., [74]). …”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is that we use the I800 dataset proposed in Cong et al [2015] to compare our method with the traditional supervised framework. The I800 dataset [Cong et al 2015] is annotated with pixel-level ground truth. It includes 389 lesion images and 400 normal images.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Latent Concept Codebookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few years, many computer-aided endoscopy diagnosis systems have been proposed, such as feature extraction [Coimbra and Cunha 2006;Wu et al 2007;Riaz et al 2012], feature selection [Cong et al 2015;Huang et al 2008;Li and Meng 2012], lesion classification [Buchner et al 2010;Li and Meng 2009;Kumar et al 2012;Yuan et al 2015;Mamonov et al 2014], video summarization [Chu et al 2010;Mehmood et al 2014;Iakovidis et al 2010], image enhancement [Muto et al 2011;Shahidi et al 2003;Gono et al 2004], and video segmentation [Mackiewicz et al 2008;Shen et al 2012]. Even though most of the existing systems obtain attractive performance, they stand on top of large detailed annotated images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the lesions, the decision support systems can be classified to handle bleeding [10], [11], Helicobacter pylori [12], [13], Crohn's disease [7], tumors [14], polyps [15], ulcers [2], and cancers [16], [17]. The commonly used classification models are support vector machine (SVM) [17], [18], neural network [19], fuzzy logic principles [20], clustering-based methods [21], and filter-based methods [22]. For supportive systems, they usually provide some support to guide and make a diagnosis easier for clinicians, such as enhancing image quality [23], detecting informative frames [24], pose detection for endoscopy [25], WCE color video segmentation [26], and feature detection [27].…”
Section: A Computer-aided Endoscopic Diagnosis Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%