2017
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2017.00057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Sequencing Transcriptome Analysis of Murine Wound Healing: Effects of a Multicomponent, Multitarget Natural Product Therapy-Tr14

Abstract: Wound healing involves an orchestrated response that engages multiple processes, such as hemostasis, cellular migration, extracellular matrix synthesis, and in particular, inflammation. Using a murine model of cutaneous wound repair, the transcriptome was mapped from 12 h to 8 days post-injury, and in response to a multicomponent, multi-target natural product, Tr14. Using single-molecule RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), there were clear temporal changes in known transcripts related to wound healing pathways, and addi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While RNA-seq experiments testing the early stages of abrasive wound healing in mouse skin are qualitatively consistent with our results in lens as mRNAs for genes involved in the cytokine response are elevated by 12 hours post wounding, remain quite high at 24 hours post wounding, and generally fall by 36 hours post wounding, none of the six genes that we highlighted for study in LECs (the top three most upregulated plus three others of biological interest) were included in the top 100 changed genes in abrasive skin wounding in mice. 87 Further, the responses appear quite different quantitatively as well. For instance, while CXCL1 (the most elevated gene in LECs PCS) is also elevated after abrasive skin wounding, the response is much more mutated than in LECs while COX-2, whose mRNA is elevated 248-fold in LECs PCS, is not altered in skin post abrasive wounding at any time tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While RNA-seq experiments testing the early stages of abrasive wound healing in mouse skin are qualitatively consistent with our results in lens as mRNAs for genes involved in the cytokine response are elevated by 12 hours post wounding, remain quite high at 24 hours post wounding, and generally fall by 36 hours post wounding, none of the six genes that we highlighted for study in LECs (the top three most upregulated plus three others of biological interest) were included in the top 100 changed genes in abrasive skin wounding in mice. 87 Further, the responses appear quite different quantitatively as well. For instance, while CXCL1 (the most elevated gene in LECs PCS) is also elevated after abrasive skin wounding, the response is much more mutated than in LECs while COX-2, whose mRNA is elevated 248-fold in LECs PCS, is not altered in skin post abrasive wounding at any time tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, while CXCL1 (the most elevated gene in LECs PCS) is also elevated after abrasive skin wounding, the response is much more mutated than in LECs while COX-2, whose mRNA is elevated 248-fold in LECs PCS, is not altered in skin post abrasive wounding at any time tested. 87 The diversity of transcriptional responses to wounding is further highlighted by a recent paper demonstrating that human oral mucosa and skin have very different responses to incisional wounding, largely because the naïve oral mucosa already expresses many genes usually associated with inflammation, including S100A8 / A9 (which are among the top upregulated genes in injured lens epithelium, while CXCL1 and CCL2 (other top upregulated genes in injured mouse lens epithelium) do not upregulate after muscosal injury but are upregulated 48 hours and 5 days after incisional wounding of human skin. 88 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have started to profile the wound transcriptome [9][10][11][12]; however, changes in the epigenetic landscape of the epithelial barrier during healing is largely unknown. To this end, we used antibodies capable of identifying the specific acetylation status of histone H4 at lysines K5, K8, K12, and K16 during the process of healing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Компоненты препарата оказывают влияние на высвобождение макрофагов IL-6, которые играют ведущую роль в развитии хронического воспаления и ангиогенеза [2]. В эксперименте на животных было показано, что терапия препаратом Цель Т индуцированного артроза привела к меньшей эрозии хряща [28], чем в контрольной группе. При этом уровень васкуляризации глубоких слоев хряща был многократно меньше, чем в группе сравнения.…”
Section: оценка эффективности биорегуляционного препарата цель т в усunclassified