2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02008-7_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Sequencing of a Genetically Heterogeneous Sample: Local Haplotype Reconstruction and Read Error Correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, we configure our method to discard l-tuples that appear below a cutoff threshold defined by the first minimum in the frequency spectrum. More tailored approaches for error correction have been discussed elsewhere (Li et al, 2008;Zagordi et al, 2010a;Zhao et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2012). We observe from Table 1 that the outlined error correction scheme resulted in significant performance gain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequently, we configure our method to discard l-tuples that appear below a cutoff threshold defined by the first minimum in the frequency spectrum. More tailored approaches for error correction have been discussed elsewhere (Li et al, 2008;Zagordi et al, 2010a;Zhao et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2012). We observe from Table 1 that the outlined error correction scheme resulted in significant performance gain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We consider populations consisting of 2 to 5 haplotypes. Figures 5 and 6 compares the estimated haplotype frequencies of Mutant-Bin and state-of-the-art ShoRAH (Zagordi et al, 2010a) on the same datasets. ShoRAH aligns the reads to a reference genome to extract a minimal subset of haplotypes that explain the observed reads, while Mutant-Bin finds the minimal set of basic frequencies that explain the observed frequencies of l-tuples and clusters the l-tuples of haplotypes with similar frequency together, without any sort of alignment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations