2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep seepage of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances through the soil of a firefighter training site and subsequent groundwater contamination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
82
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the analysis of 324 Air Force sites across the continental United States impacted by AFFF, Anderson et al () showed that the ratio between the PFAS concentration in the soil and groundwater decreases with increasing clay content, which they hypothesized is due to the higher water saturation in the presence of higher clay content. In another field investigation, Dauchy et al () showed that PFAS were detected 150.3emnormalm below ground despite the presence of clay layers implying that the retardation factors in clay may not be as great as what is usually thought for other contaminants. Our modeling framework and the detailed simulations can be used to test the above hypotheses at field sites, and more generally to provide fundamental insights into the primary factors controlling the transport, migration, and retention of PFAS in the vadose zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Through the analysis of 324 Air Force sites across the continental United States impacted by AFFF, Anderson et al () showed that the ratio between the PFAS concentration in the soil and groundwater decreases with increasing clay content, which they hypothesized is due to the higher water saturation in the presence of higher clay content. In another field investigation, Dauchy et al () showed that PFAS were detected 150.3emnormalm below ground despite the presence of clay layers implying that the retardation factors in clay may not be as great as what is usually thought for other contaminants. Our modeling framework and the detailed simulations can be used to test the above hypotheses at field sites, and more generally to provide fundamental insights into the primary factors controlling the transport, migration, and retention of PFAS in the vadose zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Based on their structurally inherent thermal and chemical stability, PFAS persist in the environment where they are generally resistant to biodegradation, photooxidation, direct photolysis, and hydrolysis (Schultz et al 2003). As a result, they are widely detected in the environment (Dauchy et al 2019;Pan et al 2018), wildlife (Cui et al 2018;Escoruela et al 2018;Route et al 2014), drinking water (Guelfo and Adamson 2018;, and humans (Daly et al 2018;Hurley et al 2018;Jain 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of CECs in water bodies not only limits water reuse but it is also deleterious for the aquatic fauna as many CECs are toxic compounds and often endocrine disruptors [7,8]. Among CECs, perfluoroalkyl compounds (PFAS) represent one of the most problematic class of compounds due to their resistance to conventional water treatments and persistence in the environment [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%