2021
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2021.3074826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Radar Network Target Assignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that optimizing the RTA in the general case, where multiple radars can be assigned to each target in a multi-target environment, is fundamental and essential, as highlighted in previous studies [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [23].…”
Section: Sub-problem 2: Multi-radar To Multi-target Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth noting that optimizing the RTA in the general case, where multiple radars can be assigned to each target in a multi-target environment, is fundamental and essential, as highlighted in previous studies [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [23].…”
Section: Sub-problem 2: Multi-radar To Multi-target Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, these algorithms were developed for different problem domains and may not be directly applicable to the MRMTA problem addressed in our work. Although some preliminary work has attempted to address this aspect [23], most studies have designed machine-learning (ML) models with fixed inputs, which may not be suitable for varying environmental factors such as changing numbers of radars or targets. Notably, Meng et al [23] have shown that MRMTA based on deep reinforcement learning outperforms random assignment methods and heuristic algorithms in terms of cumulative detection duration.…”
Section: B Motivations Of This Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [17], a parameterised tracking error model of an HFV was derived considering some uncertainties that were approximated by an interval Type II fuzzy neural network. In [18], smooth functions and linear time-varying models were introduced to estimate the boundary of time-varying uncertainty, effectively compensate for the influence of faults, and achieve stable altitude and velocity tracking. In [19], for an uncertain HFV model, fault and hysterical actuators were used for high-performance adaptive controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%