“…The experimental data were linearly fitted with a slope of −0.306, suggesting an activation energy of 0.306 eV. The Δ E value is larger than those of NaMgGdTeO 6 :Mn 4+ phosphor (0.253 eV), 46 Sr 2 MgGe 2 O 7 :Mn 4+ phosphor (0.24 eV), 47 SrLaLiTeO 6 :Mn 4+ phosphor (0.23 eV), 48 and Ca 14 Al 10 Zn 6 O 35 :Mn 4+ (0.183 eV), 45 indicating that the CLN 0.6 A 0.4 :0.3%Mn 4+ phosphor exhibits better thermal stability, and the possibility of thermal quenching is smaller.…”