2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9533966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Recurrent Neural Networks with Attention Mechanisms for Respiratory Anomaly Classification

Abstract: In recent years, a variety of deep learning techniques and methods have been adopted to provide AI solutions to issues within the medical field, with one specific area being audio-based classification of medical datasets. This research aims to create a novel deep learning architecture for this purpose, with a variety of different layer structures implemented for undertaking audio classification. Specifically, bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) and Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) networks in conjunction … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such three-class lung condition detection is comparatively less challenging in comparison with the recognition of six different lung abnormalities. Similar to our studies, Wall et al [ 20 ] performed a 6-class classification task but with a random 90–10 train–test split, instead of an 80–20 subject-independent split.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Such three-class lung condition detection is comparatively less challenging in comparison with the recognition of six different lung abnormalities. Similar to our studies, Wall et al [ 20 ] performed a 6-class classification task but with a random 90–10 train–test split, instead of an 80–20 subject-independent split.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We subsequently evaluated the Coswara cough (D2), speech (D3), and breathing (D4) datasets. To compare with existing studies [ 20 ], a random 80–20 split was performed for each of these Coswara datasets for model evaluation. Table 16 , Table 17 , Table 18 , Table 19 , Table 20 and Table 21 show the detailed evaluation results and the confusion matrices of the ensemble model for the Coswara cough, speech, and breathing datasets, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations