Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Confere 2015
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p15-1086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Questions without Deep Understanding

Abstract: We develop an approach for generating deep (i.e, high-level) comprehension questions from novel text that bypasses the myriad challenges of creating a full semantic representation. We do this by decomposing the task into an ontologycrowd-relevance workflow, consisting of first representing the original text in a low-dimensional ontology, then crowdsourcing candidate question templates aligned with that space, and finally ranking potentially relevant templates for a novel region of text. If ontological labels a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early works on Question Generation were essentially rule based systems (Heilman and Smith, 2010;Mostow and Chen, 2009;Lindberg et al, 2013;Labutov et al, 2015). Current models for AQG are based on the encode-attend-decode paradigm and they either generate questions from the passage alone Yao et al, 2018) or from the passage and Passage: McLetchie was elected on the Lothian regional list and the Conservatives suffered a net loss of five seats , with leader Annabel Goldie claiming that their support had held firm, nevertheless, she too announced she would step down as leader of the party.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early works on Question Generation were essentially rule based systems (Heilman and Smith, 2010;Mostow and Chen, 2009;Lindberg et al, 2013;Labutov et al, 2015). Current models for AQG are based on the encode-attend-decode paradigm and they either generate questions from the passage alone Yao et al, 2018) or from the passage and Passage: McLetchie was elected on the Lothian regional list and the Conservatives suffered a net loss of five seats , with leader Annabel Goldie claiming that their support had held firm, nevertheless, she too announced she would step down as leader of the party.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labutov et al (2015) proposed an 'ontologycrowd-relevance' method for question generation. First, Freebase types and Wikipedia session names are used as semantic tags to understand texts.…”
Section: Question Generation For Qamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clarification questions are not. Outside reading comprehension questions, Labutov et al (2015) studied the problem of generating question templates via crowdsourcing, Liu et al (2010) use template-based question generation to help authors write better related work sections, Mostafazadeh et al (2016) consider question generation from images, and Artzi and Zettlemoyer (2011) use human-generated clarification questions to drive a semantic parser.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%