2012
DOI: 10.1021/pr3004375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Proteome Profiling of Circulating Granulocytes Reveals Bactericidal/Permeability-Increasing Protein as a Biomarker for Severe Atherosclerotic Coronary Stenosis

Abstract: Coronary atherosclerosis represents the major cause of death in Western societies. As atherosclerosis typically progresses over years without giving rise to clinical symptoms, biomarkers are urgently needed to identify patients at risk. Over the past decade, evidence has accumulated suggesting cross-talk between the diseased vasculature and cells of the innate immune system. We therefore employed proteomics to search for biomarkers associated with severe atherosclerotic coronary lumen stenosis in circulating l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, ion exchange chromatography (strong cation exchange (SCX) 911 and strong anion exchange (SAX) 12,13 ), isoelectric focusing of peptides, 1416 and high-pH reversed-phase chromatography 1719 have been used with great success to identify an increasing number of proteins in tissues, 20,21 cells, 22 and other biological samples. 23,24 In addition, complementary digestion using proteases with alternative cleavage specificities can increase protein sequence coverage in deep proteome analyses. 5,2527 Interestingly, the fragmentation/detection modes also deliver complementary data to increase peptide identification rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, ion exchange chromatography (strong cation exchange (SCX) 911 and strong anion exchange (SAX) 12,13 ), isoelectric focusing of peptides, 1416 and high-pH reversed-phase chromatography 1719 have been used with great success to identify an increasing number of proteins in tissues, 20,21 cells, 22 and other biological samples. 23,24 In addition, complementary digestion using proteases with alternative cleavage specificities can increase protein sequence coverage in deep proteome analyses. 5,2527 Interestingly, the fragmentation/detection modes also deliver complementary data to increase peptide identification rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alignment-based quantitation of LC-MS/MS experiments can go beyond the rather limited throughput of many proteomic approaches, and due to its additional dimension of separation, as compared with SELDI or MALDI techniques, it is not so prone to the artifacts that have challenged biomarker discovery using these approaches. Therefore, label-free LC-MS/MS is likely to provide a more practical approach to biomarker discovery in leukemia and other complex diseases, in terms of coverage and throughput, toward fulfilling the promises of disease proteomics [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. For example, global profiling a single sample took 105 min with the Foss et al experimental-computational pipeline [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, LC-MS/MS provides relatively high-quality data with sufficient protein coverage and sensitivity for protein biomarker discovery studies [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Toward increased throughput, global protein profiling using label-free LC-MS/MS has received increased interest due to its potential to enable relatively straightforward and comprehensive discovery of quantitative biomarkers in large numbers of clinical samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such techniques include gel based methods like 2-DE, and non-gel based techniques like liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/ MS) and capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS). Table 1 identifies different studies in which such techniques were applied in recent years [30,36,44,50,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Proteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%