2021
DOI: 10.1002/int.22651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep node ranking for neuro‐symbolic structural node embedding and classification

Abstract: Network node embedding is an active research subfield of complex network analysis. This paper contributes a novel approach to learning network node embeddings and direct node classification using a node ranking scheme, coupled with an autoencoder-based neural network architecture. The main advantages of the proposed Deep Node Ranking (DNR) algorithm are competitive or better classification performance, significantly higher learning speed and lower space requirements when compared to state-of-the-art approaches… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue is that different embedding methods have so far only been used in isolation. We already address this challenge in the current work of the authors, where we combine complementary embedding methods from different classes: in particular, to use network traversal methods to produce initial embeddings that are then refined using a deep neural network [78]. We can observe that the relevance of individual hyperparameters varies from data set to data set.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue is that different embedding methods have so far only been used in isolation. We already address this challenge in the current work of the authors, where we combine complementary embedding methods from different classes: in particular, to use network traversal methods to produce initial embeddings that are then refined using a deep neural network [78]. We can observe that the relevance of individual hyperparameters varies from data set to data set.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%