2017 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia &Amp; Expo Workshops (ICMEW) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icmew.2017.8026250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep neural networks versus support vector machines for ECG arrhythmia classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from Table 6 that all the other works achieved less accuracy while utilizing more features than our proposed method. The authors of [ 11 , 14 , 15 ] selected a very large number of features (236, 135, and 169 features, respectively) as an optimal feature set and achieved 82.96%, 74.77%, and 88.72% accuracies, respectively. Authors of the work [ 12 ] succeeded in selecting a comparatively lesser number of features (30 features), but the accuracy obtained was 85.58%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen from Table 6 that all the other works achieved less accuracy while utilizing more features than our proposed method. The authors of [ 11 , 14 , 15 ] selected a very large number of features (236, 135, and 169 features, respectively) as an optimal feature set and achieved 82.96%, 74.77%, and 88.72% accuracies, respectively. Authors of the work [ 12 ] succeeded in selecting a comparatively lesser number of features (30 features), but the accuracy obtained was 85.58%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al [ 11 ] experimented with different feature selection methods and classification algorithms to increase the classification accuracy of the heart arrhythmia dataset. They achieved best accuracies by using neural networks only, deep neural networks only, Fisher discriminant ratio + deep neural network, and principal component analysis + deep neural network, and they used 10-fold cross-validation with each method to achieve 82.22%, 81.42%, 82.96%, and 75.22% accuracies, respectively, for each method.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mustaqeem et al [27] achieved 78.26% accuracy by selecting the best features using a wrapper algorithm and various machine-learning classifiers. Shensheng et al [28] achieved an accuracy of 80.6% using the Fisher discriminant ratio and deep neural networks using tenfold cross-validation. Özçift [29] proposed a resampling strategy based on RFs using an ensemble of classifiers and achieved 90% accuracy for 16 classes.…”
Section: Comparison Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End-to-end recognition is difficult for DNN, because it has limited abstraction ability, whereas CNN has a high abstraction power and can analyze the image features to examine the situation. At the beginning of a fire, the flame is of a small size and interval; in this situation, it is difficult to capture image features from flame video data [41]. Fuzzy algorithms utilize membership functions to represent proximity to situations that cannot be clearly divided.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%