2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep neural network model for highly accurate prediction of BODIPYs absorption

Abstract: A possibility to accurately predict the absorption maximum wavelength of BODIPYs was investigated. We found that previously reported models had a low accuracy (40-57 nm) to predict BODIPYs due to the limited dataset sizes and/or number of BODIPYs (few hundreds). New models developed in this study were based on data of 6000-plus fluorescent dyes (including 4000-plus BODIPYs) and the deep neural network architecture. The high prediction accuracy (five-fold cross-validation room mean squared error (RMSE) of 18.4 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models with the best statistical parameters were chosen to create the consensus models as average of these individual models. We observed the same effect as in the previous study [47], namely that solvent parameterization did not provide significantly better results. For example, the mean difference between RMSE of consensus models for prediction with the parameterization of solvent and without it was 0.6 nm for the JOUNG set which was within the standard mean error of the model (Table S2).…”
Section: Model Development and Testingsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The models with the best statistical parameters were chosen to create the consensus models as average of these individual models. We observed the same effect as in the previous study [47], namely that solvent parameterization did not provide significantly better results. For example, the mean difference between RMSE of consensus models for prediction with the parameterization of solvent and without it was 0.6 nm for the JOUNG set which was within the standard mean error of the model (Table S2).…”
Section: Model Development and Testingsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A 5-fold crossvalidation was used to estimate accuracy of developed models. The initial calculations were performed with and without parameterization of the solvent using procedure described elsewhere [47]. The models with the best statistical parameters were chosen to create the consensus models as average of these individual models.…”
Section: Model Development and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models based on descriptor-less methods made a good attempt at prediction of absorption maximum wavelengths of BODIPYs in a previous study. 50…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 At the first stage, the Deep Neural Network (DNN), 41 Random Forests Regression (RFR), 42 eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), 43 Transformer Convolutional Neural Fingerprint (Transformer-CNF), 44 Transformer Convolutional Neural Networks (Transformer-CNN) 45 and SchNet 46 were chosen as ML algorithms. Previously, these methods showed a good quality of predicting the spectral properties (absorption maximum wavelengths and molar absorption coefficient) of dipyrromethene compounds including BODIPYs [47][48][49][50] and thermal properties of ionic liquids. 51,52 RFR is the most flexible and easy-to-use algorithm based on classification and regression trees (CART).…”
Section: Machine Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, designing specific property-oriented molecular structures is challenging because of the lack of a complete understanding of structure–property relationships; consequently, structural modifications using functional groups to achieve products with desired properties rely mainly on the scientists’ experience. Recently, deep learning methods have been attracting significant interest as innovative approaches for understanding the structure–property relationships of molecules and accurately predicting their properties. Additionally, deep learning methods have been successful not only in estimating the molecular properties but also in predicting the influence of the surrounding interactions on the molecular properties . For example, optical properties, such as spectral position and bandwidth, photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), and fluorescence lifetime, are largely affected by the surrounding solvent molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%