2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2017.292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Network Flow for Multi-object Tracking

Abstract: Data association problems are an important component of many computer vision applications, with multi-object tracking being one of the most prominent examples. A typical approach to data association involves finding a graph matching or network flow that minimizes a sum of pairwise association costs, which are often either hand-crafted or learned as linear functions of fixed features. In this work, we demonstrate that it is possible to learn features for network-flow-based data association via backpropagation, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
161
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research of MOT primarily follows the tracking-by-detection paradigm [6,11,38,50], where object of interests is first obtained by an object detector and then linked into trajectories via data association. The data association problem could be tackled from various perspectives, e.g., min-cost flow [11,20,37], Markov decision processes (MDP) [48], partial filtering [6], Hungarian assignment [38] and graph cut [44,49]. However, most of these methods are not trained in an end-to-end manner thus many parameters are heuristic (e.g., weights of costs) and susceptible to local optima.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent research of MOT primarily follows the tracking-by-detection paradigm [6,11,38,50], where object of interests is first obtained by an object detector and then linked into trajectories via data association. The data association problem could be tackled from various perspectives, e.g., min-cost flow [11,20,37], Markov decision processes (MDP) [48], partial filtering [6], Hungarian assignment [38] and graph cut [44,49]. However, most of these methods are not trained in an end-to-end manner thus many parameters are heuristic (e.g., weights of costs) and susceptible to local optima.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these methods are not trained in an end-to-end manner thus many parameters are heuristic (e.g., weights of costs) and susceptible to local optima. To achieve end-to-end learning within the min-cost flow framework, Schulter et al [37] applies bi-level optimization by smoothing the linear programming and Deep Structured Model (DSM) [11] exploits the hinge loss. Their frameworks, however, are not designed for cross-modality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…sequent data association [3,5,52,50,1,23]. Recent learning-based trends aim at learning data association affinity functions [47,39], at obtaining temporally-stable detections [10,44,19] and at tackling joint segmentation and tracking [44]. Even though high-level path planning requires motion perception in 3D space, the task of continuous 3D state estimation of tracked targets is often neglected in existing approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though high-level path planning requires motion perception in 3D space, the task of continuous 3D state estimation of tracked targets is often neglected in existing approaches. Methods based on network flow [52,39,22,31] only focus on discrete optimization and do not estimate the continuous state of targets. Several approaches cast state estimation as inference in linear dynamical systems such as Kalman filters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%