2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58598-3_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Near-Light Photometric Stereo for Spatially Varying Reflectances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical photometric stereo approaches work with perfectly diffuse (Lambertian) surfaces, which is often an improper assumption for many objects such as metallic, glossy, and shiny. In this regard, some researchers developed new methods that physically model how light interacts with the surface of non-Lambertian surfaces (Lu et al, 2013;Santo et al, 2020;Boss et al, 2020). Other works (MacDonald, 2014;MacDonald et al, 2016;Sun et al, 2017;Wei et al, 2018;Wen et al, 2021) classify and remove the specular highlights to deal with reflective surfaces.…”
Section: Photometric Stereomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical photometric stereo approaches work with perfectly diffuse (Lambertian) surfaces, which is often an improper assumption for many objects such as metallic, glossy, and shiny. In this regard, some researchers developed new methods that physically model how light interacts with the surface of non-Lambertian surfaces (Lu et al, 2013;Santo et al, 2020;Boss et al, 2020). Other works (MacDonald, 2014;MacDonald et al, 2016;Sun et al, 2017;Wei et al, 2018;Wen et al, 2021) classify and remove the specular highlights to deal with reflective surfaces.…”
Section: Photometric Stereomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near-field datasets: There are very limited, proper nearfield labeld data including a single object from [28] and 3 simple objects from [33].…”
Section: Ps Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the increased contribution from the computer vision community to tackle the near-field PS problem, the evaluation of such methods has relied on synthetic ( [17]) or very minimal real-world datasets [28,33]. The lack of shared data has prevented detailed and fair comparisons across the different methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even objects with relatively constant emission spectra are difficult when material concentration varies [Sauer et al 2011;Zhang and Sato 2011]. Hybrid deep learning approaches combine near and far approximation lights to capture spatially varying reflectance [Santo et al 2020], but ignore effects of light penetration depth. Large volumes of data are required, and simple visible-only datasets are limiting.…”
Section: Object-scale Shapementioning
confidence: 99%