2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep near-IR photometry of eight metal-poor globular clusters in the Galactic bulge and halo

Abstract: High quality J, H and K images are used to investigate the morphological properties of the near-infrared color-magnitude diagrams for five metal-poor bulge globular clusters and three halo clusters. Photometric parameters to describe the RGB shape, i.e., the colors at fixed magnitudes of M K = M H = (−5.5, −5, −4 and −3), the magnitudes at fixed colors of (J − K) o = (J − H) o = 0.70, and the RGB slope, have been measured from the fiducial normal points of the CMDs. We also measured the near-infrared magnitude… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(101 reference statements)
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The photometric calibration equations obtained from UKIRT standard stars were then applied to the magnitudes of the stars on the target clusters. Standardizations were also double-checked in direct star-to-star comparison with the photometry of bright stars in M13 of Kim et al (2006). As shown in Kim et al (2006), there are only small photometric offsets, K = 0.03 ± 0.01 and (J − K) = 0.04 ± 0.01, between the photometric data with the UKIRT system and those with the 2MASS system of Valenti et al (2004c).…”
Section: Observations Data Reduction and Photometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The photometric calibration equations obtained from UKIRT standard stars were then applied to the magnitudes of the stars on the target clusters. Standardizations were also double-checked in direct star-to-star comparison with the photometry of bright stars in M13 of Kim et al (2006). As shown in Kim et al (2006), there are only small photometric offsets, K = 0.03 ± 0.01 and (J − K) = 0.04 ± 0.01, between the photometric data with the UKIRT system and those with the 2MASS system of Valenti et al (2004c).…”
Section: Observations Data Reduction and Photometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardizations were also double-checked in direct star-to-star comparison with the photometry of bright stars in M13 of Kim et al (2006). As shown in Kim et al (2006), there are only small photometric offsets, K = 0.03 ± 0.01 and (J − K) = 0.04 ± 0.01, between the photometric data with the UKIRT system and those with the 2MASS system of Valenti et al (2004c). The offsets will become negligible after the transformation of the fiducial normal points for the observed near-infrared CMD into the 2MASS photometric system (see Sect.…”
Section: Observations Data Reduction and Photometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations