2020
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2020.80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep multi-scale learning for automatic tracking of internal layers of ice in radar data

Abstract: In this study, our goal is to track internal ice layers on the Snow Radar data collected by NASA Operation IceBridge. We examine the application of deep learning methods on radar data gathered from polar regions. Artificial intelligence techniques have displayed impressive success in many practical fields. Deep neural networks owe their success to the availability of massive labeled data. However, in many real-world problems, even when a large dataset is available, deep learning methods have shown less success… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the sudden drainage of lakes beneath mountain glaciers poses a hazard to residents and infrastructure in valleys below 124,246 and so a better understanding of water storage and drainage beneath glaciers in populous areas and how the risk might change due to climate warming should be a priority. Improvements in the spatial and temporal coverage and resolution of satellites (e.g., Sentinel-1, CryoSat-2, Sentinel-3 and ICESat-2) 7,89,92,93 coupled with developments in lake detection automation 82 and machine learning 247 will likely allow these gaps to be filled, particularly for lakes that are smaller and traditionally more difficult to detect. The transition from a set of individual satellites to systems dominated by fleets and constellations of many satellites, will enable increased availability of high-resolution multi-temporal DSMs 97,248 , which are particularly well suited for picking out smaller lakes 55,59,249 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the sudden drainage of lakes beneath mountain glaciers poses a hazard to residents and infrastructure in valleys below 124,246 and so a better understanding of water storage and drainage beneath glaciers in populous areas and how the risk might change due to climate warming should be a priority. Improvements in the spatial and temporal coverage and resolution of satellites (e.g., Sentinel-1, CryoSat-2, Sentinel-3 and ICESat-2) 7,89,92,93 coupled with developments in lake detection automation 82 and machine learning 247 will likely allow these gaps to be filled, particularly for lakes that are smaller and traditionally more difficult to detect. The transition from a set of individual satellites to systems dominated by fleets and constellations of many satellites, will enable increased availability of high-resolution multi-temporal DSMs 97,248 , which are particularly well suited for picking out smaller lakes 55,59,249 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the eight methods performed best in testing area 1, almost the same as in scene 1, which indicates that the eight methods have good generalization abilities when the testing area is highly similar to the training area. In fact, most previous studies verified or compared the performances of deep learning models using the dataset division method used in scene 1 and in testing area 1 in scene 2 [26], [60], [61]. In testing area 2, when the glaciers were very clear but the surrounding geographic environment of the glaciers was quite different from that in the training area, the performances of the eight methods decreased to a certain extent.…”
Section: A Comparison Of the Eight Methods For Glacier Outline Extrac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collectively refer to the above degradation phenomena as "noise". This noise makes tracking accumulation layers challenging even for experienced glaciologists and significantly increases the workload for conventional vision algorithms [3], [5]. Even convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [6], which have become the standard machine learning algorithms for image processing, have issues in making accurate predictions from these images [5], [7], [8] since any interruptions to their input can drastically affect their prediction capability [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This noise makes tracking accumulation layers challenging even for experienced glaciologists and significantly increases the workload for conventional vision algorithms [3], [5]. Even convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [6], which have become the standard machine learning algorithms for image processing, have issues in making accurate predictions from these images [5], [7], [8] since any interruptions to their input can drastically affect their prediction capability [9]. Further, as the radar images are noisy, visually picking the layers for manual annotations either creates missing or incomplete labels for most firn layers in these images [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation