2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Multi-instance Networks with Sparse Label Assignment for Whole Mammogram Classification

Abstract: Mammogram classification is directly related to computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer. Traditional methods rely on regions of interest (ROIs) which require great efforts to annotate. Inspired by the success of using deep convolutional features for natural image analysis and multi-instance learning (MIL) for labeling a set of instances/patches, we propose end-to-end trained deep multiinstance networks for mass classification based on whole mammogram without the aforementioned ROIs. We explore three differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
142
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
142
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fully Convolutional Network CRF structural learning such as low signal-to-noise ratio, the poor contrast nature of mass and normal breast tissues. There are few work using deep networks to process the mammogram [7,34]. Dhungel et al employed multiple deep belief networks (DBNs), GMM classifier and priori knowledge as the potential functions, and structural SVM (SSVM) to perform the spatially structural learning [8].…”
Section: Radvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fully Convolutional Network CRF structural learning such as low signal-to-noise ratio, the poor contrast nature of mass and normal breast tissues. There are few work using deep networks to process the mammogram [7,34]. Dhungel et al employed multiple deep belief networks (DBNs), GMM classifier and priori knowledge as the potential functions, and structural SVM (SSVM) to perform the spatially structural learning [8].…”
Section: Radvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small volume segmentation suffers from the imbalanced data problem, where the number of voxels inside the small region is much smaller than those outside, leading to the difficulty of training. New classes of loss functions have been proposed to address this issue, including Tversky loss [32], generalized Dice coefficients [33,34], focal loss [35], adversarial loss [36], sparsity label assignment constrains [37], and exponential logarithm loss [38]. However, we found none of these solutions alone was adequate to solve the extremely data imbalanced problem (1/100,000) we face in segmenting small OARs, such as optic nerves and chiasm, from HaN images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…29,30 Among these metrics, the ACC describes the proportion between the number of positive and The calculation formulas of these metrics are shown in Eqs. (11), (12), (13), and (14), respectively, in which the contents and relations of TP, FP, FN, and TN are shown in Table II. "True" and "False" are used to represent the real nodules and non-nodules in ground-truth, and "Positive" and "Negative" are used to represent the evaluation results of nodules and non-nodules determined by the classifier.…”
Section: B1 Evaluation Metrics For Classification Performancementioning
confidence: 99%