2020
DOI: 10.1002/mp.14397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep model with Siamese network for viable and necrotic tumor regions assessment in osteosarcoma

Abstract: To achieve automatic classification of viable and necrotic tumor regions in osteosarcoma, most of the existing deep learning methods can only design a simple model to prevent overfitting on small datasets, which leads to the weak ability of extracting image features and low accuracy of the models. In order to solve the above problem, a deep model with Siamese network (DS-Net) was designed in this paper. Methods: The DS-Net constructed on the basis of full convolutional networks is composed of an auxiliary supe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table 4 , we can see that the classification effect of the DenseANet is significantly better than that of the other four models, indicating that the densely connected attention mechanism is effective. From Table 4 , we can also see that the classification effect of Baseline is better than ResNet101, which is consistent with the conclusion of our previous work [ 40 ]. From the results of the Baseline, Baseline+ARL and DenseANet models, it can be seen that as the number of attention features in the model increases, the better the classification effect of the mode.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From Table 4 , we can see that the classification effect of the DenseANet is significantly better than that of the other four models, indicating that the densely connected attention mechanism is effective. From Table 4 , we can also see that the classification effect of Baseline is better than ResNet101, which is consistent with the conclusion of our previous work [ 40 ]. From the results of the Baseline, Baseline+ARL and DenseANet models, it can be seen that as the number of attention features in the model increases, the better the classification effect of the mode.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…3 (b) into ResNet101 to construct a ResNet101+ARL model for comparing. At the same time, we combined ARL with the backbone network (Baseline) we proposed in the literature [ 40 ] to construct a Baseline+ARL model. In the experiments, we used ResNet101, ResNet101+ARL, Baseline, Baseline+ARL and DenseANet five networks to conduct five-fold cross-validations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations