The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5098965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep-level transient spectroscopy studies of electron and hole traps in n-type GaN homoepitaxial layers grown by quartz-free hydride-vapor-phase epitaxy

Abstract: We studied deep levels in quartz-free hydride-vapor-phase epitaxy (QF-HVPE)-grown homoepitaxial n-type GaN layers within which three electron and eight hole traps were detected. The dominant electron and hole traps observed in the QF-HVPE-grown GaN layers were E3 (EC − 0.60 eV) and H1 (EV + 0.87 eV), respectively. We found that the E3 trap density of QF-HVPE-grown GaN (∼1014 cm−3) was comparable with that of MOVPE-grown GaN layers, whereas the H1 trap density of QF-HVPE-grown GaN (∼1014 cm−3) was much smaller … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[40][41][42][43] Furthermore, the acceptor nature of the main defect in carbon-doped bulk GaN was recently verified by the observation of p-type conductivity that was thermally activated with E A ¼ 1.02 eV. [41,44] The calculated acceptor level also agrees with the properties of the commonly observed H1 hole trap at E V þ 0.85-0.90 eV analyzed by deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) or minority carrier transient spectroscopy [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] and the . The transition at E max ¼ 2.2 eV denoted as YL1 is related to the C N acceptor level.…”
Section: Luminescence Of Single Carbon Defectssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[40][41][42][43] Furthermore, the acceptor nature of the main defect in carbon-doped bulk GaN was recently verified by the observation of p-type conductivity that was thermally activated with E A ¼ 1.02 eV. [41,44] The calculated acceptor level also agrees with the properties of the commonly observed H1 hole trap at E V þ 0.85-0.90 eV analyzed by deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) or minority carrier transient spectroscopy [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] and the . The transition at E max ¼ 2.2 eV denoted as YL1 is related to the C N acceptor level.…”
Section: Luminescence Of Single Carbon Defectssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Especially for low unintentionally doped high-quality GaN grown by HVPE and MOCVD, a remarkable accordance between the overall carbon concentration determined by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and the H1 hole trap concentration has been found. [51,52] 2.1.2. Blue Luminescence and the C N Donor Level: BL C Interestingly, HSE-based DFT calculations additionally predict a C N donor level at energies of E V þ 0.25-0.48 eV.…”
Section: Luminescence Of Single Carbon Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C N (0/+) level is also thought to be identified by PL in HVPE GaN . Electrical measurement such as deep‐level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) provides more definitive understanding, and a variety of levels have been associated with carbon, including those for a deep acceptor, deep donor, and shallow donor . To date, most studies are performed on thin films with a limited range of carbon doping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous report, the defect state in α-NPB has been determined to be a defect state of the electron kind, which indeed exists in the site of 0.515 eV above the LUMO and whose function, in fact, can be seen as a LUMO trap according to research in this report. Sometimes there are also the concepts of electron trap and hole trap in the literature. Electron trap means the trap is close to the conduction band, and hole trap means the trap is close to the valence band. Because they both exist in the energy space between the HOMO and LUMO, they are also included in the concept of the geometric trap.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%