2010
DOI: 10.1080/07329113.2010.10756639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Legal Pluralism in South Africa: Judicial Accommodation of Non-State Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Legal pluralism is first described based on studies on land disputes [53]. The categorisation of legal pluralism on a scale of strong to weak is advocated by its supporters [54,55]. Strong legal pluralism is when customary, indigenous, and religious laws are used in land administration without state recognition [56].…”
Section: The Rule Of Law and Legal Pluralism In Improving Responsible...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legal pluralism is first described based on studies on land disputes [53]. The categorisation of legal pluralism on a scale of strong to weak is advocated by its supporters [54,55]. Strong legal pluralism is when customary, indigenous, and religious laws are used in land administration without state recognition [56].…”
Section: The Rule Of Law and Legal Pluralism In Improving Responsible...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…90 Scholars divide it into 'deep' and 'weak' versions, and describe the latter as a watered-down version of legal positivism. 91 In Africa, legal pluralism traditionally denotes the interaction of religious and indigenous laws with the (state) laws bequeathed by colonial rule. From my cross-country observations, this interaction is imitative and reflective of coloniality.…”
Section: Legal Pluralism and The Future Of African Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in various national contexts of Muslim, Catholic, Jewish, and customary and tribal family laws and religious adjudication or arbitration demonstrate that religious-based family laws are an important and often contested area directly relevant to the rights of minority communities in the country (see e.g. Rautenbach 2010;Eekelaar and Maclean 2013;Solanki 2011;Bano ed. 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%