2020
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1735666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning with long short-term memory networks and random forests for demand forecasting in multi-channel retail

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel forecasting method that combines the deep learning method -long shortterm memory (LSTM) networks and random forest (RF). The proposed method can model complex relationships of both temporal and regression type which gives it an edge in accuracy over other forecasting methods. We evaluated the new method on a real-world multivariate dataset from a multichannel retailer. We benchmark the forecasting performance of the new proposition against neural networks, multiple regression, ARIMA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(56 reference statements)
2
62
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The LSTM were implemented using Keras library in R ( Chollet, 2015 ). The work of Punia, Nikolopoulos et al (2020) was followed for implementation and hyperparameter optimization of the LSTM networks.…”
Section: Description Of Machine- and Deep-learning Forecasting Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LSTM were implemented using Keras library in R ( Chollet, 2015 ). The work of Punia, Nikolopoulos et al (2020) was followed for implementation and hyperparameter optimization of the LSTM networks.…”
Section: Description Of Machine- and Deep-learning Forecasting Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the Mean Absolute Scaled Error (MASE) and the Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE) for each iteration ( Makridakis et al, 2020 ; Shankar, Ilavarasan, Punia & Singh, 2019 ). We calculated the relative errors by dividing with the corresponding error from the naïve method ( Punia, Nikolopoulos, Singh, Madaan & Litsiou, 2020 ). We report in Table 2 the relative (to naïve) medians for: MASE (RelMdMASE), and SMAPE (RelMdMAPE).…”
Section: Forecasting the Evolution Of The Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Conv1D-RF based on OFSM had the highest accuracy (94.27%) and K coefficient (0.917) among all types of networks, so this hybrid network is assumed to be the best choice in this study. This study compared the hybrid Conv1D-RF network with popular deep-learning based networks, including LSTM-RF [49], ResNet [50], and U-Net [51]. LSTM-RF uses RF instead of the FC layer to make the final classification decision.…”
Section: Rf-rfe Ofsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study compared the hybrid Conv1D-RF network with popular deep-learning based networks, including LSTM-RF [49], ResNet [50], and U-Net [51]. LSTM-RF uses RF instead of the FC layer to make the final classification decision.…”
Section: Comparison Of Conv1d-rf With Mainstream Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [24] dealt with the problem of long-term dependence in sequence data due to insufficient memory capacity in LSTM cells, solving it using an attention-aware bidirectional multi-residual recurrent neural network (ABMRNN). Punia et al [45] presented a new predictive method that combines LSTM and random forest (RF), the efficiency of which is compared to other methods, such as neural networks, multiple regression, ARIMAX (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with Explanatory Variable), etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%