2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2202.12678
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning, Natural Language Processing, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence in the Biomedical Domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the authors propose the methodology to combat existing approaches based on three factors: reliability, resilience, and personalization. The work in [92] describes existing AI techniques like ML/DL/NLP in and extends the survey to explain the importance of EXAI in future medicine and biomedical applications. Authors in [29] implements analyze the medical ECG data on proposing a generalized model, ST-CNN-GAP-5, that implements DNN algorithms using online available two ECG datasets with the achieved accuracy of 95.8% and AUC value of 99.46%.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the authors propose the methodology to combat existing approaches based on three factors: reliability, resilience, and personalization. The work in [92] describes existing AI techniques like ML/DL/NLP in and extends the survey to explain the importance of EXAI in future medicine and biomedical applications. Authors in [29] implements analyze the medical ECG data on proposing a generalized model, ST-CNN-GAP-5, that implements DNN algorithms using online available two ECG datasets with the achieved accuracy of 95.8% and AUC value of 99.46%.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBMs can be trained using more effective algorithms than unrestricted Boltzmann machines. In classification applications, RBMs are frequently used for feature extraction [15]. Data imbalance, which can significantly reduce performance, is a major challenge to medical image classification, as negative instances are much smaller than positive ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%