2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cibcb.2017.8058543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning models for bone suppression in chest radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we adopt dilated convolutions to expand the receptive field, but different from the work of Eslami et al, 14 we use gradually increased dilation factors instead of a fixed one. More importantly, downsampling operations are removed after the dilated convolution to overcome the problem of contextual information loss With the rise of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for image processing and analysis, a number of deep learning models have been developed to solve this problem, 3,10,11,14 given the strong capability of CNNs to model highly nonlinear mapping, such as the case in bone suppression. Many of them are based on an auto-encoder architecture, and optimize the model parameters to minimize pixel-wise differences between the target and predicted x-ray images.…”
Section: A Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, we adopt dilated convolutions to expand the receptive field, but different from the work of Eslami et al, 14 we use gradually increased dilation factors instead of a fixed one. More importantly, downsampling operations are removed after the dilated convolution to overcome the problem of contextual information loss With the rise of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for image processing and analysis, a number of deep learning models have been developed to solve this problem, 3,10,11,14 given the strong capability of CNNs to model highly nonlinear mapping, such as the case in bone suppression. Many of them are based on an auto-encoder architecture, and optimize the model parameters to minimize pixel-wise differences between the target and predicted x-ray images.…”
Section: A Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of them are based on an auto-encoder architecture, and optimize the model parameters to minimize pixel-wise differences between the target and predicted x-ray images. 10,11 More recent studies took advantage of generative adversarial network (GAN), 3 which optimizes the image generators by adding discriminators as assisting components during the training session. Moreover, study from Eslami et al 14 showed us an effective receptive field of the generator plays an essential role in improving cGAN for the bone suppression problem.…”
Section: A Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study, Gusarev et al proposed two deep learning architectures to perform bone suppression and creating a soft tissue image. Considering bones as a noise level that is affecting these chest images [20], they tried to minimize the presence of this noise (i.e., bone) while still preserving the sharpness of the image for the eventual organ segmentation. In [57], many of the noise suppressing methods reviewed where the main objective in all these methods is to remove as much of the noise as possible while preserving most of the relevant details in the image.…”
Section: B Task 2: Bone and Rib Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The k-nearest neighbor regression method with optimized local features has been also proposed to perform the separation of bone and tissue components in chest radiographs [14]. Deep learning models transform standard CXR images into soft-tissue images by treating bones as noise through autoencoder-like model and multi-layer neural model for bone suppression [16]. An improved performance of bone suppression method was obtained by learning the mapping between the gradients of the CXRs and the corresponding bone images [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%