2020
DOI: 10.1364/boe.402508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning model for ultrafast quantification of blood flow in diffuse correlation spectroscopy

Abstract: Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) is increasingly used in the optical imaging field to assess blood flow in humans due to its non-invasive, real-time characteristics and its ability to provide label-free, bedside monitoring of blood flow changes. Previous DCS studies have utilized a traditional curve fitting of the analytical or Monte Carlo models to extract the blood flow changes, which are computationally demanding and less accurate when the signal to noise ratio decreases. Here, we present a deep learn… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5 lists existing deep learning methods applied to DCS techniques. It shows that DCS-NET’s training is much faster than 2DCNNs, 40 approximately 140-fold faster. Although the remaining models, RNN, 39 LSTM, 41 and ConvGRU, 42 have fewer total layers, they are limited to a specific ρ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 5 lists existing deep learning methods applied to DCS techniques. It shows that DCS-NET’s training is much faster than 2DCNNs, 40 approximately 140-fold faster. Although the remaining models, RNN, 39 LSTM, 41 and ConvGRU, 42 have fewer total layers, they are limited to a specific ρ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, DCS-NET’s training datasets were generated using the semi-infinite diffusion model as advised in Ref. 40. Nevertheless, this model does not consider scalp and skull thicknesses, which could potentially explain why the error range (6%+8%) caused by Δ1 and Δ2 is much broader than that (1%+5%) caused by μa and μs (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The computational processing requirements of holographic FD-DCS are high, especially when operating in real-time at fast frame rates. With a view to reducing the computational demand of conventional DCS experiments, deep learning techniques have recently been employed [ 44 ], resulting in a 23-fold increase in the speed of blood flow quantification. The application of deep learning techniques to holographic FD-DCS would be an interesting further study.…”
Section: Outlook and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%