2018
DOI: 10.1364/ol.43.005669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning model for ultrafast multifrequency optical property extractions for spatial frequency domain imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its prevalence and increasing importance in the field of medical imaging, machine learning has only recently been explored for optical property mapping. This includes a random forest regressor to replace the nonlinear model inversion [32], and using deep neural networks to reconstruct optical properties from multifrequency measurements [33]. Both of these approaches aim to bypass the time-consuming LUT step in SFDI.…”
Section: Machine Learning In Optical Property Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its prevalence and increasing importance in the field of medical imaging, machine learning has only recently been explored for optical property mapping. This includes a random forest regressor to replace the nonlinear model inversion [32], and using deep neural networks to reconstruct optical properties from multifrequency measurements [33]. Both of these approaches aim to bypass the time-consuming LUT step in SFDI.…”
Section: Machine Learning In Optical Property Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential solution to decrease this delay is to increase the acquisition rate (500 fps for instance) but it requires to increase the light fluence from the sources to maintain proper SNR and prevent noise in the images. Finally, current state-of-the-art processing methods in the spatial frequency domain include optimized LUTs (down to 18 ms for 572 × 672 pixels), 24 as well as deep learning and machine learning methods (down to 200 ms for 696 × 520 pixels), 28,29 and soon, faster methods that will enable real-time processing and visualization of data will certainly be developed. Efforts are ongoing to combine rapid processing of SSOP data, with spatiotemporal modulation of light, onto a clinically compatible device to test and validate the capacity for diffuse optical imaging to provide relevant data in real time during concrete clinical applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multispatial frequency processing codes were developed to take into account this effect in cases where divergence is significant, such as within an endoscope. 16,40 Finally, many other sources of errors such as camera linearity, projection linearity, and source stability, as in any optical design should be taken into account, either by calibration or monitoring and/or appropriate analytic or empirical corrections. 41,42 One aspect that should not be neglected is the quality of the projection and acquisition, and the resulting demodulation as this will have a direct influence onto the precision and accuracy of the measurement.…”
Section: Key Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple approaches have been developed for analyzing SFD signals to determine homogeneous or spatially resolved optical properties, including least-squares methods, 2,43 LUTs, 1,44 machine learning and deep learning, 40,45 and data matching to empirical phantom grids. 46 The choice of computation model is important and application specific.…”
Section: Inverse Models and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%