2020
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/202022501004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Methods On Neutron Scattering Data

Abstract: Recently, by using deep learning methods, a computer is able to surpass or come close to matching human performance on image analysis and recognition. This advanced methods could also help extracting features from neutron scattering experimental data. Those data contain rich scientific information about structure and dynamics of materials under investigation. Deep learning could help researchers better understand the link between experimental data and materials properties. Moreover,it could also help to optimi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supervised ML has also proved to be an efficient tool for direct parameter extraction from SAS data (main application 3, Fig. 2), which might be difficult or time-consuming for humans to detect, such as orientation, 68 shape, [69][70][71] or the model for SAS form factor tting. [72][73][74] For example, the Scattering Ai aNalysis (SCAN) tool can predict the model for SAS form factor tting from a SAXS pattern obtained from a nanoparticle.…”
Section: Raghavendra Selvanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised ML has also proved to be an efficient tool for direct parameter extraction from SAS data (main application 3, Fig. 2), which might be difficult or time-consuming for humans to detect, such as orientation, 68 shape, [69][70][71] or the model for SAS form factor tting. [72][73][74] For example, the Scattering Ai aNalysis (SCAN) tool can predict the model for SAS form factor tting from a SAXS pattern obtained from a nanoparticle.…”
Section: Raghavendra Selvanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While an averaged particle size is easily available from SANS data, detailed information about size distribution and geometry are difficult to obtain, making any support by Machine Learning (ML) algorithms desirable. Some efforts in using ML algorithms for SANS data have already been made in one-dimensional curves 9,10 and in two-dimensional images 11 showing great potential on small datasets. Nevertheless, algorithms like deep neural networks require large datasets and this becomes a problem in neutron science because conducting experiments in real-world settings is time-consuming (due to complex sample preparations, experimental setups, and data collection processes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, work on bulk crystallography started many years ago and has showed impressive progress (Tatlier, 2011;Oviedo et al, 2019;Lee et al, 2020;Bai et al, 2018). Other standard scattering methods, such as small-angle scattering, have also received considerable attention, especially for classification tasks (Song et al, 2020;Ikemoto et al, 2020;Franke et al, 2018;Archibald et al, 2020;Chang et al, 2020). For nonstandard coherent scattering methods, such as X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy (XPCS), ML-based analysis using autoencoders has been employed (Konstantinova et al, 2021;Timmermann et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%