2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2016.7591483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning framework for detection of hypoglycemic episodes in children with type 1 diabetes

Abstract: Abstract-Most Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients have hypoglycemia problem. Low blood glucose, also known as hypoglycemia, can be a dangerous and can result in unconsciousness, seizures and even death. In recent studies, heart rate (HR) and correct QT interval (QTc) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) signal are found as the most common physiological parameters to be effected from hypoglycemic reaction. In this paper, a state-of-the-art intelligent technology namely deep belief network (DBN) is developed as a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies co-authored by Prof. Hung T. Nguyen 41,42,44,53,54,75,76 involved nocturnal hypoglycemia detection in 15 type 1 diabetic children using different machine learning techniques (extreme learning 41 , hybrid swarm optimization 53 , neural networks 54 , genetic algorithms 44 , and a few others), using as inputs different ECG parameters computed from 5 or 10 minutes ECG excerpts, and achieving promissing sensitivity and specificity. For example, the more recent studies, proposed models based on a neural logic approach 76 , obtaining 79.07% sensitivity and 53.64% specificity, deep belief network approach 77 , achieving 80% sensitivity and 50% specificity, models based on extreme learning approach, obtaining 78% sensitivity and 60% specificity. As we already emphasised, direct performance comparison with those studies is not viable as the model we proposed is person-specific, which, in our opinion, explains why the proposed method outperforms the results achieved in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies co-authored by Prof. Hung T. Nguyen 41,42,44,53,54,75,76 involved nocturnal hypoglycemia detection in 15 type 1 diabetic children using different machine learning techniques (extreme learning 41 , hybrid swarm optimization 53 , neural networks 54 , genetic algorithms 44 , and a few others), using as inputs different ECG parameters computed from 5 or 10 minutes ECG excerpts, and achieving promissing sensitivity and specificity. For example, the more recent studies, proposed models based on a neural logic approach 76 , obtaining 79.07% sensitivity and 53.64% specificity, deep belief network approach 77 , achieving 80% sensitivity and 50% specificity, models based on extreme learning approach, obtaining 78% sensitivity and 60% specificity. As we already emphasised, direct performance comparison with those studies is not viable as the model we proposed is person-specific, which, in our opinion, explains why the proposed method outperforms the results achieved in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For T1DM diagnosed patients, the use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) devices in combination with machine learning techniques has been widely used for predicting near future glycemic events. The research study in [ 11 ] used a Deep Believe Network (DBN) model and Electrocardiogram (ECG) signal to detect the natural occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycemia, using 15 children with T1DM who were monitored for 10 h overnight at the Princess Margaret Hospital for Children in Perth, Western Australia. Bertachi et al [ 12 ] also investigated the feasibility of a machine-learning-based prediction model to anticipate Nocturnal Hypoglycemia (NH) in T1DM patients, using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) devices and physical activity trackers under free-living conditions at home.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the BG data, various preprocessing approaches had been used including differencing (derivative) BG values [27,28], CGM data reconstruction, or smoothing using different methods such as spline interpolation [29-33], a rough feature elimination, such as fast separability and correlation analysis algorithm [28,29], representing BG temporal change information [34], feature selection and feature ranking [35], filtering using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) and the t test, and the wrapper approach using greedy backward elimination [33]. The other physiological parameters (heart rate, ECG, skin impedance, and others) had been preprocessed using different methods such as normalization [36-38], feature extraction and selection [39,40], feature extraction using fast Fourier transform (FFT) [41], unsupervised restricted Boltzmann machine–based feature representation [42], filtering techniques such as Infinite impulse response high pass filter [41,43], correlation analysis [44-46], and transformation of frequency domain into time domain (FFT) [47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%