2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/smc.2016.7844673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning for solar power forecasting — An approach using AutoEncoder and LSTM Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
242
0
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 434 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
242
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The study found that the proposed ELM model has higher predictive accuracy and a lower arithmetic time than the output power generated by the photoelectric system. Gensler et al 29 used a group consisted of deep learning algorithms such as MLP, deep belief networks, AutoEncoder, and LSTM to predict and use them in the renewable energy field. The study aimed to show the strength of these approaches compared with the physical prediction model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study found that the proposed ELM model has higher predictive accuracy and a lower arithmetic time than the output power generated by the photoelectric system. Gensler et al 29 used a group consisted of deep learning algorithms such as MLP, deep belief networks, AutoEncoder, and LSTM to predict and use them in the renewable energy field. The study aimed to show the strength of these approaches compared with the physical prediction model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long short-term memory (LSTM) 17 which is a kind of DL method is chosen in this paper, since it is widely used in presenting many aspects of the economy 18 and energy. 19,20 Selecting variables before performing regression is also an important problem. Some traditional methods such as principal components analysis (PCA), 21 Kernel principal components analysis (KPCA), 22 or Bayes 23 are widely used in the field of energy economics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can conclude that GRU neural networks do better in both convergence speed and training time, which depends on the improved single structure of GRU units. We also performed the experiments to compare with current methods such as back-propagation neural networks (BPNNs) [7,8], stacked autoencoders (SAEs) [17], RNNs [24,25], and LSTM [29][30][31]. Their parameters and structures are set as described in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results Of Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%