2017 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/bibm.2017.8217826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning for skin lesion segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thanks to the discovery and development of new methods for the precise identification of skin cancer, extensive research has been carried out in various areas. Many tactics are employed to the skin laceration segmentation tricky, including active contour approaches [3], the threshold method [4], and other machine learning generated methods [5][6][7][8][9]. A common non-learning method for skin segmentation is the Otsu method [10,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the discovery and development of new methods for the precise identification of skin cancer, extensive research has been carried out in various areas. Many tactics are employed to the skin laceration segmentation tricky, including active contour approaches [3], the threshold method [4], and other machine learning generated methods [5][6][7][8][9]. A common non-learning method for skin segmentation is the Otsu method [10,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berseth et al [38] developed a U-Net architecture for segmenting skin lesions based on the probability map of the image dimension where the ten-fold cross validation technique was used for training the model. Mishra [17] presented a deep learning technique for extracting the lesion region from dermoscopic images.…”
Section: Segmentation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the above details pertaining to the incidence and mortality rate associated with melanoma, timely diagnosis becomes all the more necessary for providing effective treatment to the affected. Insofar as the detection and segmentation of lesion boundaries, there are two streams of methodologies: first, traditional methods that usually resort to visual inspection by the clinician, and second, semi-automated and automated methods, which mostly involve point-based pixel intensity operations [9,10], pixel clustering methods [11][12][13][14], level set methods [15], deformable models [16], deep-learning based methods [17][18][19], et cetera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although visual inspection proved positive in the non-invasive early diagnosis of melanoma, the limits of the human visual capacity lead to inaccuracies due to the morphological structures and their side effects. The inaccuracies might be due to many factors; among them, some are: hair presence, variable lesion sizes, colour and shape, irregular boundaries of asymmetrical lesions, or poor contrast regarding the normal skin and the lesion [5]. The interest in automatic image analysis methods is twofold: the relevance of quantitative information for a lesion and playing as an early warning tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%