2021
DOI: 10.1109/jas.2021.1003865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning for EMG-based Human-Machine Interaction: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
85
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
1
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, sEMG signals have a user-specific nature, causing the amplitude and frequencies to be highly variable among individuals even when signals are measured from the same location with the same motion [18]. Although it has been reported that features learned by deep neural networks may be able to share similar distributions across different subjects [11,19], the inter-subject problem can still lead to a sharp decline in the estimation performance of the previously trained model [11,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, sEMG signals have a user-specific nature, causing the amplitude and frequencies to be highly variable among individuals even when signals are measured from the same location with the same motion [18]. Although it has been reported that features learned by deep neural networks may be able to share similar distributions across different subjects [11,19], the inter-subject problem can still lead to a sharp decline in the estimation performance of the previously trained model [11,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many mathematical methods for analyzing EEG, EMG, and tremor signals have been developed. Historically, EMG analysis methods evolved from spectral analysis [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ] and time-domain signal analysis methods such as morphological analysis [ 8 ], amplitude analysis [ 9 ], and autoregressive analysis [ 10 , 11 ] towards time–frequency domain analysis [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. The state-of-the-art of EMG analysis methods is characterized by the active use of nonlinear data analysis methods [ 17 ], such as fractal analysis [ 18 ], phase analysis [ 19 ], recurrent quantification analysis [ 4 , 20 , 21 ], and the deep learning of neural networks [ 12 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, EMG analysis methods evolved from spectral analysis [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ] and time-domain signal analysis methods such as morphological analysis [ 8 ], amplitude analysis [ 9 ], and autoregressive analysis [ 10 , 11 ] towards time–frequency domain analysis [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. The state-of-the-art of EMG analysis methods is characterized by the active use of nonlinear data analysis methods [ 17 ], such as fractal analysis [ 18 ], phase analysis [ 19 ], recurrent quantification analysis [ 4 , 20 , 21 ], and the deep learning of neural networks [ 12 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. According to the authors, the existing methods for analyzing EEG, EMG, and tremor signals, such as wavelet analysis [ 26 , 27 , 28 ], focus on local time–frequency changes in the signal and, therefore, do not reveal the generalized properties of the signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to restore the patient's lost limb function or assist them for daily activities such as eating and drinking, artificial hands, exoskeletons, robotic arms, smart wheelchairs and other assistive robots have emerged (Wu et al, 2018;Kaur, 2021). How to establish a natural, efficient and stable human-computer interface (HCI) has become a difficult and hot point in the research of interactive control of rehabilitation aids (Mussa-Ivaldi et al, 2013;Venkatakrishnan et al, 2014;Gordleeva et al, 2020;Xiong et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with lower recognition accuracy or need additional stimulation for EEG-based HCI (such as motor imagery and steady state visual evoked potential) (Lin et al, 2016;Chu et al, 2018) and relative fewer recognizable intentions for EOG-based HCI (Bastos-Filho et al, 2014;He and Li, 2017) or hybrid gaze-brain machine interface (Li et al, 2017;Krausz et al, 2020;Zeng et al, 2020), EMG-based HCI has been widely used in the field of neurorehabilitation with the advantage of higher accuracy and stability, especially for decoding motor intentions of the limb with EMG (Ding et al, 2015;Hussain et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2019). However, intent recognition based on limb EMG is still facing a huge challenge due to the abnormal signal in the absence of limb function (Jaramillo-Yánez et al, 2020;Xiong et al, 2021). Hence, instead of limb EMG, a novel intention recognition method based on facial electromyography (fEMG) and the HCI based on fEMG have been paid attention and partly researched (Hamedi et al, 2011;Tamura et al, 2012;Bastos-Filho et al, 2014;Nam et al, 2014;Inzelberg et al, 2018;Kapur et al, 2018Kapur et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%