2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-02255-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning diagnostic and severity-stratification for interstitial lung diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in digital lung auscultations and ultrasonography: clinical protocol for an observational case–control study

Johan N. Siebert,
Mary-Anne Hartley,
Delphine S. Courvoisier
et al.

Abstract: Background Interstitial lung diseases (ILD), such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are severe, progressive pulmonary disorders with a poor prognosis. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is important to enable patients to receive appropriate care at the earliest possible stage to delay disease progression and prolong survival. Artificial intelligence-assisted lung auscultation and ultrasound (LUS) co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 79 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in a real-life study, physician evaluation was more specific despite both being highly sensitive [42]. Moreover, by combining murmur sound and LUS, a deep-learning algorithm was able to differentiate ILDs from COPD patients [43]. The use of AI in chest imaging was boosted by the COVID-19 pandemic [44], but automatic imaging evaluation was more on CT scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a real-life study, physician evaluation was more specific despite both being highly sensitive [42]. Moreover, by combining murmur sound and LUS, a deep-learning algorithm was able to differentiate ILDs from COPD patients [43]. The use of AI in chest imaging was boosted by the COVID-19 pandemic [44], but automatic imaging evaluation was more on CT scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%