2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep-learning-based recognition of symbols and texts at an industrially applicable level from images of high-density piping and instrumentation diagrams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Against the traditional methods which rely on hand-crafted feature engineering, these DL methods are fully automated in their architecture to perform both feature engineering and classification (and regression) tasks efficiently. This transition to DL-based models has greatly improved process efficiencies [7], equipment condition monitoring [4], spatiotemporal forecasting [8], and a host of many other solutions [5,[9][10][11]; however, they are faced with challenges ranging from over-fitting, interpretability, optimal hyperparameter selection (and optimization), standardized weight initialization paradigm, and finding the optimal decision criteria between power consumption and performance [1,12]. Nonetheless, considering the need for accurate real-time solutions for ICPS components especially with the growing need for uncertainty modeling, sensor data discrepancies, dynamic environmental and operating conditions, etc., DL methods remain preferable even at the cost of computational power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against the traditional methods which rely on hand-crafted feature engineering, these DL methods are fully automated in their architecture to perform both feature engineering and classification (and regression) tasks efficiently. This transition to DL-based models has greatly improved process efficiencies [7], equipment condition monitoring [4], spatiotemporal forecasting [8], and a host of many other solutions [5,[9][10][11]; however, they are faced with challenges ranging from over-fitting, interpretability, optimal hyperparameter selection (and optimization), standardized weight initialization paradigm, and finding the optimal decision criteria between power consumption and performance [1,12]. Nonetheless, considering the need for accurate real-time solutions for ICPS components especially with the growing need for uncertainty modeling, sensor data discrepancies, dynamic environmental and operating conditions, etc., DL methods remain preferable even at the cost of computational power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the proposed line recognition method, the results of recognizing symbols and texts included in P&ID are used as input. Therefore, using the method in [40], the symbols and texts included in the test P&IDs were recognized prior to the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several studies [33][34][35] have reported the recognition of various types of diagrams, such as electrical diagrams, engineering diagrams, logic diagrams, and piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID). With recent developments in deep learning algorithms, there has been active research on the application of CNN-based deep learning methods in the process of diagram recognition [36][37][38][39][40]. In [36] recognition of a simple logic diagram with general application targets was done.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yun et al [23] apply region-based convolutional neural networks on P&IDs and find a 98% symbol recognition rate in their experiments. Kim et al [15] perform deep learning and object character recognition on a data set of P&IDs and report a 97.2% precision for symbol recognition. A study by Kim at al.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%