2022
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2021.3140050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning-Based Pulse Height Estimation for Separation of Pile-Up Pulses From NaI(Tl) Detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At higher count rate, the pile-up issue becomes the dominant effect. This defect can be detected using deep learning technique at higher rates [21]. However, the recovery of pile-up pulses can be done using our previous proposed implemented algorithms in [22,23].…”
Section: Modeling Of Bgo and Lso Pulses Using Block Diagram Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At higher count rate, the pile-up issue becomes the dominant effect. This defect can be detected using deep learning technique at higher rates [21]. However, the recovery of pile-up pulses can be done using our previous proposed implemented algorithms in [22,23].…”
Section: Modeling Of Bgo and Lso Pulses Using Block Diagram Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…large amounts of data in high-radiation environments by directly estimating the pulse heights through the input of partial pulse data based on simple data processing into a deep learning model [17].…”
Section: Jinst 18 C12002mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a deep learning-based PHE method was optimized for pile-up signal correction in high-radiation field. The overall PUC process adopted the previous PHE method [17] but with a modification of the peak-finding (PF) method to enhance the count restoration rate. Additionally, the performances of two deep learning models (convolutional neural networks (CNN) and deep neural networks (DNN)) were evaluated based on the input data length, which significantly affects efficient data processing.…”
Section: Jinst 18 C12002mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations