2021
DOI: 10.1002/pip.3416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep‐learning‐based pipeline for module power prediction from electroluminescense measurements

Abstract: Automated inspection plays an important role in monitoring large-scale photovoltaic power plants. Commonly, electroluminescense measurements are used to identify various types of defects on solar modules, but have not been used to determine the power of a module. However, knowledge of the power at maximum power point is important as well, since drops in the power of a single module can affect the performance of an entire string. By now, this is commonly determined by measurements that require to discontact or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, cracks and power loss in modules has been evaluated using light and dark I-V measurements over several stages of degradation [19]. Characterization of electrical parameters and statistical analysis of cracked PERC and Al-BSF cells in mini-modules was analyzed by Whitaker [20] and very recently, deep learning has been used to make power predictions from EL images of modules with solar cell cracks [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, cracks and power loss in modules has been evaluated using light and dark I-V measurements over several stages of degradation [19]. Characterization of electrical parameters and statistical analysis of cracked PERC and Al-BSF cells in mini-modules was analyzed by Whitaker [20] and very recently, deep learning has been used to make power predictions from EL images of modules with solar cell cracks [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent trends in global climate policy stimulated a dramatic growth of photovoltaic (PV) deployment with an expected level of tens of terawatts worldwide to be reached in one to two decades. , This enormous growth serves as a locomotive for the development of associate technologies in the production, monitoring, and recycling of PV modules. In particular, the expected TW scale of PV installations requires efficient high-throughput procedures for automated characterization of the status of deployed PV modules, their integrity, performance, and state of degradation. The most promising technologies for the high-throughput characterization include different imaging techniques, such as thermography, electroluminescence (EL), , and photoluminescence (PL) imaging, , which can be realized on automated moving/flying platforms and provide essential information on the module performance and type/population of defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the expected TW scale of PV installations requires efficient high-throughput procedures for automated characterization of the status of deployed PV modules, their integrity, performance, and state of degradation. 3−6 The most promising technologies for the high-throughput characterization include different imaging techniques, such as thermography, 7−10 electroluminescence (EL), 11,12 and photoluminescence (PL) imaging, 13,14 which can be realized on automated moving/ flying platforms and provide essential information on the module performance and type/population of defects.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such machine learning techniques have shown great potential as diagnostic tools for PV systems, boasting high detection and diagnostic accuracy for a wide range of failure modes [8]. Typical input features for the machine learning models include 1-dimensional (1D) data such as environmental time-series data (irradiance, ambient temperature, module temperature, wind speed), electrical parameter data (voltage, current, power, energy) [3,15,16], and IV characteristics [17][18][19][20] or 2-dimensional (2D) data such as visual (Vis) images [21], electroluminescence (EL) images [22][23][24][25][26], infrared (IR) images [3,27,28], and full IV curves [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%