2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep-learning based multiclass retinal fluid segmentation and detection in optical coherence tomography images using a fully convolutional neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
89
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This we see is also the case in the analysis of three fluid labels in the RETOUCH challenge where, in the best performing instances, the approach is to first segment the data, second train a CNN with image data and segmentation as input, and third refine the final result using an additional classifier. 13,29 We see a benefit of having the segmentation element using non-trained data and all of the fluid segmentation within a single CNN, as is reported here. But consensus exists that encoding spatial information about the retinal tissue as an additional channel to the input image data is shown to improve the overall performance of the segmentation algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This we see is also the case in the analysis of three fluid labels in the RETOUCH challenge where, in the best performing instances, the approach is to first segment the data, second train a CNN with image data and segmentation as input, and third refine the final result using an additional classifier. 13,29 We see a benefit of having the segmentation element using non-trained data and all of the fluid segmentation within a single CNN, as is reported here. But consensus exists that encoding spatial information about the retinal tissue as an additional channel to the input image data is shown to improve the overall performance of the segmentation algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Without standardization, images of different sizes, contrast levels, and textures that are not generalizable to a single AI algorithm are obtained. 43,44 Raster pattern dimensions are not consistent between devices, ranging from 128 × 256 to 256 × 768. 40 Different acquisition times and signal-to-noise ratios among devices result in variable image quality.…”
Section: Lack Of a Standardized Acquisition Image Registration And mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…de Sisternes et al 45 created 4 models, each trained using voxel features extracted at 4 different resolutions that correspond to the resolutions of each OCT imaging device. Venhuizen et al 44 combined predictions generated from 3 CNNs at different image scales across entire OCT volumes to segment intraretinal fluid. Lu et al 36 produced individual CNNs for each of the 3 OCT devices separately.…”
Section: Lack Of a Standardized Acquisition Image Registration And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent times, deep learning techniques have also been applied, in works like the ones proposed by Lee et al [19], Venhuizen et al [20], Roy et al [21], Lu et al [22], and Chen et al [23], which aimed too for a precise segmentation and most of them based on the U-Net architecture of Ronnenberger et al [24], an encoder-decoder architecture with skip connections to preserve relevant features from the encoder in the decoder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%