2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-33850-3_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Based Multi-modal Registration for Retinal Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They applied their method on different combinations of modalities including fundus autofluorescence (FAF) to scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO)/OCT, fluorescein angiogram (FA) to OCT‐angiography (OCT‐A), and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) to FA and compared their algorithm with intensity based multimodal affine registrations from elastix. They achieved an average error rate of 13.12% versus 30.8% using the reference method, which confirmed that multi‐modal registration of retinal images using vessel segmentation and landmark detection was more accurate than reference methods 12 . Lee et al introduced a non‐human dependent method for multimodal retinal image registration that is based on CNN 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They applied their method on different combinations of modalities including fundus autofluorescence (FAF) to scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO)/OCT, fluorescein angiogram (FA) to OCT‐angiography (OCT‐A), and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) to FA and compared their algorithm with intensity based multimodal affine registrations from elastix. They achieved an average error rate of 13.12% versus 30.8% using the reference method, which confirmed that multi‐modal registration of retinal images using vessel segmentation and landmark detection was more accurate than reference methods 12 . Lee et al introduced a non‐human dependent method for multimodal retinal image registration that is based on CNN 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Arikan et al used vessel segmentation and automatic landmark detection to establish image registration, the process of aligning two or more images based on image appearances. They developed an algorithm allowing for tracing changes in retinal structure across different retinal imaging modalities 12 . They performed automatic multi‐modal retinal 2D/3D image registration using U‐Net for vessel segmentation and mask regional CNNs (R‐CNN) for detection of vessel landmarks (bifurcations, branches and crossover).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, considering the case of deep learningbased multimodal retinal image registration, there are works where rigid or deformable transformations are obtained using supervised, weakly supervised, or unsupervised approaches [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. While deformable methods [19,22,23] are more competitive than rigid ones [17,18,20,21], the former generally require that the input image pair is already approximately registered (usually via an affine transformation). To do the latter, there are two options: incorporate this stage into the methodology itself or assume that this step was previously performed with an external method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to the unsupervised methods [18,19,23], they have the advantage of not requiring segmentation knowledge, but in the context of multimodal images, the absence of this type of knowledge tends to reduce the accuracy of the obtained registration. As for the purely supervised methods [17,20], the requirement of a highquality ground-truth can hinder their applicability, especially in a context associated with medical images and their daily use in clinical practice. Finally, regarding the weakly supervised methods [21,22], such as the one proposed here, they allow us to solve the shortcomings of the previous two (supervised and unsupervised), given that the segmentation knowledge required may be partial and imprecise (it may even contain noise), but it is still useful enough to guide and improve the registration process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation