2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2020.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning-based forecasting of aggregated CSP production

Abstract: This paper introduces deep learning-based forecasting models for the continuous prediction of the aggregated production generated by CSP plants in Spain. These models use as inputs the expected top of atmosphere irradiance values and available weather conditions forecasts for the locations where the main CSP power plants are installed. The performances of the forecast models are analysed and compared by means of the most extended metrics in the literature for a whole year of CSP energy production.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, days in zone III are the hardest to predict, and days in the zone CI are the easiest, as they are clear sky days with low variability. All the GHI measurements used in this work are available at (Segarra-Tamarit et al, 2020) to facilitate the reproducibility of this research. Furthermore, as the archive of GHI estimates at http://msgcpp.knmi.nl only stores the last three years of data, the matrices used in this work are also provided within this repository.…”
Section: Model Selection and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, days in zone III are the hardest to predict, and days in the zone CI are the easiest, as they are clear sky days with low variability. All the GHI measurements used in this work are available at (Segarra-Tamarit et al, 2020) to facilitate the reproducibility of this research. Furthermore, as the archive of GHI estimates at http://msgcpp.knmi.nl only stores the last three years of data, the matrices used in this work are also provided within this repository.…”
Section: Model Selection and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%