2021
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11061052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning-Based Differentiation between Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm and Serous Cystic Neoplasm in the Pancreas Using Endoscopic Ultrasonography

Abstract: Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) and serous cystic neoplasms (SCN) account for a large portion of solitary pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN). In this study we implemented a convolutional neural network (CNN) model using ResNet50 to differentiate between MCN and SCN. The training data were collected retrospectively from 59 MCN and 49 SCN patients from two different hospitals. Data augmentation was used to enhance the size and quality of training datasets. Fine-tuning training approaches were utilized by adopting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, studies focusing on the detection and differentiation between mucinous and non-mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions based on EUS images are scarce. To the authors’ knowledge, only one study focusing on this subject has been previously published [ 13 ]. Nevertheless, the development of AI algorithms for the evaluation of pancreatic diseases is a subject of increasing interest [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particularly, studies focusing on the detection and differentiation between mucinous and non-mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions based on EUS images are scarce. To the authors’ knowledge, only one study focusing on this subject has been previously published [ 13 ]. Nevertheless, the development of AI algorithms for the evaluation of pancreatic diseases is a subject of increasing interest [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we developed a deep learning algorithm for the automatic classification of PCLs as mucinous vs. non-mucinous. Nguon and coworkers implemented a CNN model to differentiate MCN and SCA using EUS images [ 13 ]. Their algorithm achieved an overall accuracy around 80%, which is in line with the classification performance of experienced endosonographers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the diagnostic accuracy of human interpretation was 56%, and that of the presence of an intracystic mural nodule was 68% [ 41 ]. AI has also been able to differentiate between types of PCLs: CNNs have been used to differentiate between EUS morphologies of MCNs ( n = 60) and SCAs ( n = 49) with 82.75% accuracy and a 0.88 (95% CI: 0.817–0.930) area under curve score [ 42 ].…”
Section: Ai and Eus In Pcl Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning models are being developed to extract complex features from image data and are widely used in the field of medical imaging [ 8 ]. Previous studies have used deep learning models for the classification and segmentation of pancreatic EUS images [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Kuwahara et al [ 9 ] proved that a deep learning model (ResNet50) can diagnose the malignancy of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%