2022
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2021.3134452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning-Based Defect Detection From Sequences of Ultrasonic B-Scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many NDT&E technologies have applied intelligent algorithms for the automatic detection and identification of defects through artificial neural networks. For instance, convolutional neural networks have been used to automatically extract features from raw data, classify ultrasonic signals (Shi et al, 2022), and train deep learning object detectors from the sequences of ultrasonic B-scans (Medak et al, 2021). In general, the algorithm enhancements can yield better detection accuracy or faster detection speed than previous analysis approaches.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many NDT&E technologies have applied intelligent algorithms for the automatic detection and identification of defects through artificial neural networks. For instance, convolutional neural networks have been used to automatically extract features from raw data, classify ultrasonic signals (Shi et al, 2022), and train deep learning object detectors from the sequences of ultrasonic B-scans (Medak et al, 2021). In general, the algorithm enhancements can yield better detection accuracy or faster detection speed than previous analysis approaches.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Medak et al trained an EfficientDet-based model to accomplish the location of multi-defects and obtained good performance on ultrasonic images [17]. They further optimized this model using high-dimensional feature map fusion [18], and the detection accuracy has substantially improved. Posilovic et al [19] introduced two new methods: YOLO and SSD algorithms for the detection of internal defects based on Bscan images, and achieve the average accuracy of 89.7% and 84.5% respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they developed a large dataset of phased array ultrasonic images, which they were able to use to conduct a robust validation of their results using a 5-fold cross-validation. In a more recent work [15], Medak et al developed two approaches to incorporate the A-scan signal surrounding a defect area into the detection architecture. One approach was based on model expansion, the second method extracts the features separately, and they are then merged in the detection head.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset consists of several C-scans with different cases of void structures. The idea was to train a CNN on 2D cases, evaluated on a 2D test set, and use the trained network to infer ultrasonic 3D data as a sequence of C-scans, long the lines of the approach using B-scans reported in [15]. Experiments were performed on two 150 × 40 × 5 mm 3 CFRP coupons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%