2021
DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning-based brain transcriptomic signatures associated with the neuropathological and clinical severity of Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract: Brain tissue gene expression from donors with and without Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have been used to help inform the molecular changes associated with the development and potential treatment of this disorder. Here, we use a deep learning method to analyze RNA-seq data from 1,114 brain donors from the Accelerating Medicines Project for Alzheimer’s Disease (AMP-AD) consortium to characterize post-mortem brain transcriptome signatures associated with amyloid-β plaque, tau neurofibrillary tangles, and clinical sev… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it was encouraging to see such a large number of DEGs that are unique to each domain despite the overlapping design, which may suggest that each BPSD domain has distinct biological etiologies despite the common neuropathological driversin this case, AD. These findings may be comparable to other investigations showing distinct pathways associated with cognitive decline in AD at the transcriptomic, proteomic, and methylation levels in brain tissue without overlapping dependence on being correlated with AD pathology [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79], highlighting the heterogeneity of downstream molecular processes from what is putatively considered the upstream etiological agents, namely A and tau. Though this design has the advantage of increasing statistical power in exploring a wide array of symptoms, it presumes separability that precludes identification of individuals with overlapping psychiatric domains that may have unique molecular mechanisms distinct from if these symptoms presented separately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, it was encouraging to see such a large number of DEGs that are unique to each domain despite the overlapping design, which may suggest that each BPSD domain has distinct biological etiologies despite the common neuropathological driversin this case, AD. These findings may be comparable to other investigations showing distinct pathways associated with cognitive decline in AD at the transcriptomic, proteomic, and methylation levels in brain tissue without overlapping dependence on being correlated with AD pathology [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79], highlighting the heterogeneity of downstream molecular processes from what is putatively considered the upstream etiological agents, namely A and tau. Though this design has the advantage of increasing statistical power in exploring a wide array of symptoms, it presumes separability that precludes identification of individuals with overlapping psychiatric domains that may have unique molecular mechanisms distinct from if these symptoms presented separately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Lastly, the size and scope (quantitative regional neuropathology, longitudinal cognition, and RNA-sequencing) of the ROSMAP dataset means that there was no dataset available where we could replicate the machine learning approach used here. However, both PRTN3 and ADAMTS2 (as well as other highly ranked genes such as PPDPF , SLC6A9 , SLC4A11 ) were recently identified as relevant to AD progression by an independent study using deep learning on the Mount Sinai Brain Bank and ROSMAP transcriptomic datasets ( Wang et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang and colleagues implemented a DL method that analyzes RNA-seq data from brain donors to characterize post mortem brain transcriptome signatures associated with amyloid-β plaques, tau neurofibrillary tangles and clinical severity in multiple AD and related dementia populations. 58 In the proteomics space, Tasaki and colleagues applied a deep neural network approach to predict protein abundance from mRNA expression, in an attempt to track the early protein drivers of AD and related dementia subtypes. 72 These approaches demonstrate how such methodologies can be used to identify potential early protein drivers and possible drug targets for preventing or treating AD and related dementias.…”
Section: Examples Of Best Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang and colleagues have recently developed EWASplus, a computational method that uses a supervised ML strategy to extend EWAS coverage to the entire genome, 38 and implicates additional epigenetic loci for AD that are not found using array‐based AD EWASs. Wang and colleagues implemented a DL method that analyzes RNA‐seq data from brain donors to characterize post mortem brain transcriptome signatures associated with amyloid‐β plaques, tau neurofibrillary tangles and clinical severity in multiple AD and related dementia populations 58 . In the proteomics space, Tasaki and colleagues applied a deep neural network approach to predict protein abundance from mRNA expression, in an attempt to track the early protein drivers of AD and related dementia subtypes 72 .…”
Section: Key Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%