2023
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1209558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning auto-segmentation on multi-sequence magnetic resonance images for upper abdominal organs

Abstract: IntroductionMulti-sequence multi-parameter MRIs are often used to define targets and/or organs at risk (OAR) in radiation therapy (RT) planning. Deep learning has so far focused on developing auto-segmentation models based on a single MRI sequence. The purpose of this work is to develop a multi-sequence deep learning based auto-segmentation (mS-DLAS) based on multi-sequence abdominal MRIs.Materials and methodsUsing a previously developed 3DResUnet network, a mS-DLAS model using 4 T1 and T2 weighted MRI acquire… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amjad et al. ( 42 ) used multi-sequence MR images acquired from 3.0 T MR device for training to segment abdominal organs, achieving better segmentation results for the kidneys, the duodenum and the stomach. These improvements might be attributed to their utilization of a diagnostic MR device avoiding MR-Linac possible artefacts ( 43 ), offering a higher magnetic field strength with a better image contrast and a training based on several MR contrasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amjad et al. ( 42 ) used multi-sequence MR images acquired from 3.0 T MR device for training to segment abdominal organs, achieving better segmentation results for the kidneys, the duodenum and the stomach. These improvements might be attributed to their utilization of a diagnostic MR device avoiding MR-Linac possible artefacts ( 43 ), offering a higher magnetic field strength with a better image contrast and a training based on several MR contrasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%