2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-022-04980-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning approach for cancer subtype classification using high-dimensional gene expression data

Abstract: Motivation Studies have shown that classifying cancer subtypes can provide valuable information for a range of cancer research, from aetiology and tumour biology to prognosis and personalized treatment. Current methods usually adopt gene expression data to perform cancer subtype classification. However, cancer samples are scarce, and the high-dimensional features of their gene expression data are too sparse to allow most methods to achieve desirable classification results. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the performance of the proposed system to a number of different current schemes of classification using gene expression datasets in this section. We specifically compared our proposed approach to those put forth by Alrefai et al, 45 Majji et al, 46 Balcı et al, 47 Shen et al, 48 and Wang et al, 49 Almarzouki et al, 50 Aziz et al, 8 Hanczar et al 51 We measured each scheme's performance at 86.7, 91.76, 90.07, 86.62, 94.32, 90.24, and 89.23, respectively, while our proposed model performance is 98.70. These findings are summarized Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the performance of the proposed system to a number of different current schemes of classification using gene expression datasets in this section. We specifically compared our proposed approach to those put forth by Alrefai et al, 45 Majji et al, 46 Balcı et al, 47 Shen et al, 48 and Wang et al, 49 Almarzouki et al, 50 Aziz et al, 8 Hanczar et al 51 We measured each scheme's performance at 86.7, 91.76, 90.07, 86.62, 94.32, 90.24, and 89.23, respectively, while our proposed model performance is 98.70. These findings are summarized Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria were highly heterogeneous, but they all focused on urological cancer. Finally, 58 studies on urological cancers (prostate cancer: 21 [ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ], bladder cancer: 20 [ 5 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ], kidney cancer: 17 [ 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 ]) were identified as shown in Fig. 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective DL model called DCGN was presented [28] by integrating CNN and bidirectional gated recurrent unit (BiGRU) for cancer subtypes classification. BiGRU analyzes deep features, cancer subtype classification is improved by DCGN's ability to deal with high-dimensional data and extract local characteristics.…”
Section: Gem Based Cancer Performance Prediction Using DL Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a comparative analysis is conducted between proposed and earlier models implemented on the considered literature: 1D-CNN [26], DL-DCGN [28] DL-SAE [29] and DL-AAA [31] regarding the following metrics:…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%