2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2918086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Applied to Steganalysis of Digital Images: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, steganalysis is classified into two phases-the first phase is separating and analyzing the distinctive features and properties of images. The second is the classification phase that uses classifiers such as SVM (Support Vector Machines) and Ensemblers [9]. In recent times, various deep learning techniques have made it possible to merge these two phases and carry them out parallelly to obtain positive results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, steganalysis is classified into two phases-the first phase is separating and analyzing the distinctive features and properties of images. The second is the classification phase that uses classifiers such as SVM (Support Vector Machines) and Ensemblers [9]. In recent times, various deep learning techniques have made it possible to merge these two phases and carry them out parallelly to obtain positive results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy used was based on the guidelines proposed by Wen et al (2012) and used in Franco-Bedoya et al (2017) and Reinel, Raul & Gustavo (2019). To define the need for a systematic review, we searched through published and available reviews (secondary studies) on the topic of interest.…”
Section: Identification Of the Need For A Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy used was based on the guidelines proposed by (Wen et al, 2012) and used in (Franco-Bedoya et al, 2017) and (Tabares-Soto, Ramos-Pollan & Isaza, 2019). To define the need for a systematic review, we searched through published and available reviews (secondary studies) on the topic of interest.…”
Section: Identification Of the Need For A Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%