2018
DOI: 10.2495/eid180141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Application to Time-Series Prediction of Daily Chlorophyll-a Concentration

Abstract: Algal bloom in rivers is a major environmental concern which threatens the stable water supply and river ecosystem. Due to its complexity and nonlinearity, previous studies have tried various machine learning techniques to predict algal bloom. However, conventional approaches have limitations on predicting unobserved near future, and thus it is hard to apply to actual preparation policy. In this study, long short-term memory (LSTM), as a deep learning approach, is applied to predict the concentration of chloro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to these hydro-ecological models, one of the major advantages of machine learning models is that they do not require a priori assumptions (Breiman, 2001;Tsanas and Xifara, 2012;Zhao and Zhang, 2008). In the following non-exhaustive list, it is evident that many studies use this advantage of machine learning to bypass the prediction difficulties concerning the phytoplankton: (Cho et al, 2018;Cho and Park, 2019;Du et al, 2018;Kehoe et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2016;Lee and Lee, 2018;Rivero-Calle et al, 2015;Shamshirband et al, 2019;Shin et al, 2017;Thomas et al, 2018;Yajima and Derot, 2018;Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to these hydro-ecological models, one of the major advantages of machine learning models is that they do not require a priori assumptions (Breiman, 2001;Tsanas and Xifara, 2012;Zhao and Zhang, 2008). In the following non-exhaustive list, it is evident that many studies use this advantage of machine learning to bypass the prediction difficulties concerning the phytoplankton: (Cho et al, 2018;Cho and Park, 2019;Du et al, 2018;Kehoe et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2016;Lee and Lee, 2018;Rivero-Calle et al, 2015;Shamshirband et al, 2019;Shin et al, 2017;Thomas et al, 2018;Yajima and Derot, 2018;Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Has a high complexity and computational cost. [46][47][48][49] The vector autoregressive (VAR) model, which extends the AR model to the multivariate setting, emerged as a solution to address this latter issue. A VAR model is an n-variable, n-equation linear model in which each variable is explained by its own lagged values, plus current and past values of the remaining n − 1 variables [23].…”
Section: Autoregressive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, when large variations in chl-a occurred, the LSTM model predictions were closer to the actual data than those of the MLP model. Cho et al (2018) [47] used a deep recurrent network composed of LSTM units to predict algal blooms in Geum River, South Korea. The authors used daily water quality parameters measured from 2013 to 2017 to predict chl-a concentration one-and four-days in advance.…”
Section: Recurrent Neural Network (Rnns)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CC-BY 4.0 International license made available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 12, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.12.443749 doi: bioRxiv preprint chlorophyll concentrations, mainly in fresh water systems, with a few in marine regions [8], [9], [10], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%