2023
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59010172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep-Learning and Device-Assisted Enteroscopy: Automatic Panendoscopic Detection of Ulcers and Erosions

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has a significant role in approaching enteric lesions. Endoscopic observation of ulcers or erosions is frequent and can be associated with many nosological entities, namely Crohn’s disease. Although the application of artificial intelligence (AI) is growing exponentially in various imaged-based gastroenterology procedures, there is still a lack of evidence of the AI technical feasibility and clinical applicability of DAE. This study aimed to develop … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies were only based on images and our study also assessed ENDOANGEL-DBE’s performance with videos. Miguel Martins et al [ 51 ] developed a model recognizing erosions and ulcers from normal images, whose sensitivity was higher than ours. Since they did not use an independent test set, the images in their test set and training set might come from the same cases, and using such a test set might lead to higher results than those in the real world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…These studies were only based on images and our study also assessed ENDOANGEL-DBE’s performance with videos. Miguel Martins et al [ 51 ] developed a model recognizing erosions and ulcers from normal images, whose sensitivity was higher than ours. Since they did not use an independent test set, the images in their test set and training set might come from the same cases, and using such a test set might lead to higher results than those in the real world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%