2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95616-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning and citizen science enable automated plant trait predictions from photographs

Abstract: Plant functional traits (‘traits’) are essential for assessing biodiversity and ecosystem processes, but cumbersome to measure. To facilitate trait measurements, we test if traits can be predicted through visible morphological features by coupling heterogeneous photographs from citizen science (iNaturalist) with trait observations (TRY database) through Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). Our results show that image features suffice to predict several traits representing the main axes of plant functioning. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(111 reference statements)
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rubric required student observations to include more and higher quality details for each observation. These observations are more likely to be suitable for use in research studies (Barve et al, 2020; Echeverria et al, 2021; Gazdic & Groom, 2019; Horn et al, 2018; Schiller et al, 2021). It is our hope that moving forward plant taxonomy courses make use of the rubric and continue improving upon it in a student-centered manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rubric required student observations to include more and higher quality details for each observation. These observations are more likely to be suitable for use in research studies (Barve et al, 2020; Echeverria et al, 2021; Gazdic & Groom, 2019; Horn et al, 2018; Schiller et al, 2021). It is our hope that moving forward plant taxonomy courses make use of the rubric and continue improving upon it in a student-centered manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies note that the main weakness of crowd-sourced, geotagged, photo-based vegetation maps is that the spatial density of field data is very diverse, that is, very spatially fragmented data [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. However, the LUCAS database is based on spatially uniform survey points with uniform data density, and therefore, the representativeness of the data is higher compared to crowd-sourced vegetation databases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such potentials may be even accelerated with the concurrent developments of big data in ecology (Depauw et al, 2022; Farley et al, 2018). Data gaps of leaf angles across species may be filled with AngleCam and in concert with the ever increasing availability of citizen science photographs and species labels (the iNaturalist project, Di Cecco et al, 2021; Schiller et al, 2021). Likewise, AngleCam may be applicable to data streams from PhenoCam networks (Aasen et al, 2020; Seyednasrollah et al, 2019) to track plant phenology and its relationship with environmental drivers across the globe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis for the CNN model was the EfficientNet-B7 as backbone (Tan & Le, 2019), which was found most accurate and efficient compared to common available backbones (we also tested versions (Schiller et al, 2021).…”
Section: General Considerations and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%